Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 15;35(28):10202–10211. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1595-15.2015

Table 3.

Element-wise differences in WM integrity between the IHTT-slow and control groups, and between the IHTT-normal and control groups

IHTT-slow vs control group
IHTT-normal vs control group
FA
MD
FA
Tract significance (%) Minimum p Tract significance (%) Minimum p Tract significance (%) Minimum p
CC-frontal 18.6 1.86E-08 3.5 1.06E-05 5 1.28E-06
CC-prcg 1.2 1.74E-06 1.3 2.14E-05
CC-pocg 2.1 2.42E-04 8.7 1.69E-06
CC-parietal 2.9 1.94E-06 12.6 4.09E-06
CC-temporal 14 1.94E-06 3.8 2.09E-06
CC-occipital 17.5 5.02E-07 17 6.44E-08
atr_l 0.9 3.96E-04
atr_r 1.9 6.57E-05 2.2 5.26E-06
cgc_l 0.8 8.96E-05
cgc_r 0.9 2.28E-04
cst_l 2.8 3.34E-05 0.8 7.54E-05
cst_r 3.6 3.10E-05 3.2 1.86E-05
ifo_l 12.9 1.07E-06 14.2 4.00E-07 0.9 6.17E-05
ifo_r 7.9 1.09E-05 10.8 1.77E-06
ilf_l 3.8 8.61E-06 31.9 2.43E-09
ilf_r 6 7.31E-06 9.6 5.39E-06
slf_l 2.7 1.05E-04 3.5 7.31E-06
Fornix 1.7 2.67E-04

For each tract investigated, the percentage of the tract that passed the FDR threshold is given (FDR threshold for IHTT-slow vs control FA = 0.0038, for MD = 0.0036, and for IHTT-normal vs control FA = 6.5 × 10−4), as well as the minimum p value for group differences on each tract. pocg, Postcentral gyrus; prcg, precentral gyrus.