Table 2. Summary of improved genome assembly.

	Scaffolds		Length (Mb)		Genes
Chr	Original	Revised	Original	Revised	Original	Revised
1	8	13	28.18	29.63	1262	1328
2	4	5	23.29	23.7	861	907
3	5	10	16.79	17.8	934	1004
4	8	12	32.63	34.14	1329	1410
5	6	9	12.25	15.56	733	861
6	5	8	17.08	18.85	721	760
7	7	12	27.93	30.84	1320	1481
8	6	7	19.36	20.53	885	924
9	9	11	20.24	20.58	1012	1016
10	2	8	15.66	18.03	816	931
11	7	10	16.7	17.64	1060	1108
12	6	13	18.4	20.76	1007	1138
13	6	9	20.08	20.74	971	1014
14	3	7	15.24	16.17	739	792
15	5	8	16.19	17.32	778	823
16	3	7	18.11	19.52	803	864
17	6	8	14.6	20.25	702	1064
18	4	3	16.28	15.99	764	739
19	3	5	20.24	20.61	1046	1086
20	5	8	19.73	20.45	934	990
21	5	13	11.71	17.35	464	614
Total	113	186	400.7	436.45	19,141	20,854

A comparison of the original genome assembly and the revised scaffold order presented in this study. The number of scaffolds, the physical size in megabases (Mb), and the number of Ensembl-predicted genes (Jones et al. 2012) are compared.