Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 15.
Published in final edited form as: Diabetes Care. 2004 Jan;27(1):129–133. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.1.129

Table 3.

Adjusted RRs (95% CIs) according to presence of depressive symptoms in various cohort subgroups*

Multivariate RR Interaction
P value
BMI (kg/m2) 0.55
 <25 (n§ = 34,379) 0.87 (0.40–1.89)
 25–29.9 (18,628) 1.43 (0.97–2.11)
 >30 (14,812) 1.24 (0.96–1.61)
Smoking 0.82
 Yes (10,361) 1.28 (0.77–2.12)
 No (61,817) 1.21 (0.97–1.53)
Parental history of diabetes 0.47
 Yes (14,474) 1.11 (0.79–1.56)
 No (57,687) 1.28 (0.99–1.66)
Alcohol consumption 0.62
 Yes (47,888) 1.24 (0.92–1.67)
 No (24,290) 1.23 (0.92–1.63)
*

Relative risk of developing type 2 diabetes for women with depressive symptoms compared with women without depressive symptoms;

calculated using stratified pooled logistic regression with same covariates as in Table 2;

calculated using likelihood ratio test by subtracting −2logL for multivariate model with interaction from −2logL for multivariate model without interaction. Test has a χ2 distribution with v degrees of freedom, where v = (dfmodel with interaction) − (dfmodel without interaction);

§

n = number of nurses in that category at baseline.