Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 15;10:20. doi: 10.1186/s13027-015-0015-z

Table 6.

Multivariable evaluations of the association between explanatory variables and the presence of LSIL+ lesions

Type of analysis Study groups included Number of observations* Explanatory variables included in the model Adjusted OR 95 % CI
Logistic regression 1 (HIV screening centres HIV-positive women) 124 Age of first sexual intercoursea 0.86 0.72 – 1.02
Number of pregnancies
0 – 2 1
3 – 5 0.95 0.31 – 2.86
6 or more 0.83 0.28 – 2.44
Abortion 1.98 0.83 – 4.75
Logistic regression 2 (HIV screening centres HIV-negative women) 123 Agea 1.11 0.95 – 1.31
Marital status
married 1
single 5.26 0.27 – 102.32
widowed 4.34 0.18 – 105.99
divorced §
Number of pregnancies
0 – 2 1
3 – 5 1.15 0.07 – 18.34
6 or more 4.27 0.22 – 81.82
Logistic regression 3 (Hospitals HIV status unknown) 502 Formal employment 2.08 0.74 – 5.88
Abortion 1.65 0.53 – 5.14
≥3 lifetime sexual partners 1.75 0.69 – 4.46
Plants for vaginal care 2.85 0.75 – 10.82
Logistic regression 4 (Health centres HIV status unknown) 203 Age of first sexual intercoursea 0.86 0.68 – 1.07
Formal employment 0.30 0.06 – 1.50
GEE 1, 2 3 and 4 886 Abortion 1.60 0.97 – 2.63
≥3 lifetime sexual partners 1.29 0.83 – 1.99
Chemicals for vaginal care 0.65 0.37 – 1.14
Logistic regression 3 and 4 643 Alcohol consumption 1.76 0.80 – 3.86
≥3 lifetime sexual partners 1.58 0.72 – 3.46
Plants for vaginal care 2.70 1.04 – 7.01**

LSIL+: cytology findings compatible with (pre)cancerous lesions (includes low- and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and carcinoma)

OR odds ratio; 95 % CI 95 % confidence interval of the odds ratio

GEE: generalized estimating equations (population-averaged model; group variable: study group)

aAge was treated as a continuous variable

§ Odds ratio could not be calculated because there were cells without observations

**P-value of Wald test < 0.05