Skip to main content
. 2015 May 1;8(5):5403–5410.

Table 1.

Comparison of clinicopathological characteristics of Xp11.2 RCC and CCRCC

Xp11.2 RCC (n=22) CCRCC (n=32) P
Gender (male/female) 9/13 22/10 0.042
Age: mean ± SE (range, years) 25.8±2.5 (3~51) 60.2±2.2 (40~81) <0.001
Gross hematuria incidence 9/22 (40.9%) 0/32 (0%) <0.001
Tumor diameter: mean ± SE (range, cm) 5.28±0.45 (3.0~10.0) 3.80±0.23 (2.0~6.2) 0.002
Pseudocapsule incidence (percentage) 14/22 (63.6%) 32/32 (100.0%) <0.001
Pseudocapsule integrity rate (percentage) 10/14 (71.4%) 23/32 (71.9%) 1.000
Numbers of small/large tumors (threshold: 7 cm) 17/5 31/1 0.036
Age of small tumors: Mean ± SE (range, years) 25.5±2.9 (3~51) 59.7±2.2 (40~81) <0.001
Diameter of smaller tumors (Mean ± SE, cm) 4.27±0.24 3.72±0.22 0.118
Diameter of larger tumors (Mean ± SE, cm) 8.72±0.33 -- --
Pseudocapsule incidence of small tumors (%) 13/17 (76.5%) 32/32 (100%) 0.011
Pseudocapsule incidence of large tumors (%) 1/5 (20.0%) -- --
Pseudocapsule integrity rate of small tumors (%) 9/13 (69.2%) 23/32 (71.9%) 0.711
Pseudocapsule integrity rate of large tumors (%) 1/1 (100%) -- --
Pseudocapsule penetration information 3 cases ≥4 cm 1 case =3.9 cm 8 cases ≥4 cm 1 case =3.5 cm 1.000

Xp11.2 RCC, renal cell carcinoma associated with Xp11.2 translocation/TFE3 gene fusion; CCRCC, clear cell renal cell carcinoma; SE, standard error.