Skip to main content
. 2015 May 1;8(5):5403–5410.

Table 2.

Clinicopathological characteristics and survival of patients with CCRCC and Xp11.2 RCC treated with different surgical methods

CCRCC (n=32) Xp11.2 RCC (n=22)

RN group (n=12) TE group (n=20) P RN group (n=19) RN in small group (n=14) Pa
Age: mean ± SE (range, years) 70.2±2.8 (51~81) 54.2±2.1 (40~69) <0.001 24.1±2.5 (3~40) 23.1±2.9 (3~40) <0.001
Tumor diameter: mean ± SE (range, cm) 4.78±0.28 (3.2~6.2) 3.22±0.24 (2.2~5.5) <0.001 5.50±0.50 (3~10) 4.35±0.27 (3~6) 0.215
Stage (I/II/III/IV) 9/0/1/2 18/0/0/2 0.395 11/1/4/3 11/0/2/1 0.911
Pseudocapsule incidence (%) 12/12 (100%) 20/20 (100%) 1.000 11/19 (57.9%) 10/14 (71.4%) 0.012
Pseudocapsule integrity rate (%) 5/12 (41.7%) 18/20 (90%) 0.006 7/11 (63.6%) 6/10 (60%) 0.292
Median follow-up time (range, months) 39.5 (14~70) 36.5 (7~71) 0.795 39 (5~85) 45.5 (5~85) 0.820
3-year progression-free survival rate (%) 77% 85% 0.733 86% 100% 0.931
5-year progression-free survival rate (%) 77% 66% 0.733 72% 82% 0.931
3-year overall survival rate (%) 86% 92% 0.845 84% 100% 0.567
5-year overall survival rate (%) 86% 81% 0.845 65% 71% 0.567

Xp11.2 RCC, renal cell carcinoma associated with Xp11.2 translocation/TFE3 gene fusion; CCRCC, clear cell renal cell carcinoma; RN, radical nephrectomy; TE, tumor enucleation; SE, standard error.

a

P value concerning comparison between 19 Xp11.2 RCC and 12 CCRCC treated by RN.