Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 15;10(7):e0131635. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131635

Table 2. Sensitivity and specificity, ROC area, PPV, NPV, number of patients of NE, BAEPs, SEPs, MRS, NPS for diagnostic test of MRI and grading of MRI ND-LCH.95% Confidence Intervals in parentheses.

Sensitivity Specificity ROC area PPV NPV N° patients
MRI
    NE 52.9%(27.8%-77.0%) 90.0%(55.5%-99.7%) 0.71(0.50–0.86) 90.0%(55.5%-99.7%) 52.9%(27.8%-77.0%) 27
    BAEPs 29.4%(10.3%-56.0%) 90.0%(55.5%-99.7%) 0.60(0.39–0.78) 83.3%(35.9%-99.6%) 42.9%(21.8%-66.0%) 27
    SEPs 70.6%(44.0%-89.7%) 100.0%(69.2%-100%)* 0.85(0.66–0.96) 100.0%(73.5%-100%)* 66.7%(38.4%-88.2%) 27
    MRS 52.9%(27.8%-77.0%) 90.0%(55.5%-99.7%) 0.71(0.50–0.86) 90.0%(55.5%-99.7%) 52.9%(27.8%-77.0%) 27
    NPS# 22.2%(2.8%-60.0%) 71.4%(29.0%-96.3%) 0.47(0.20–0.70) 50.0%(6.8%-93.2%) 41.7%(15.2%-72.3%) 16
Grading of MRI cut-off grading level > 1
    NE 80.0%(44.4%-97.5%) 88.2%(63.6%-98.5%) 0.84(0.66–0.96) 80.0%(44.4%-97.5%) 88.2%(63.6%-98.5%) 27
    BAEPs 30.0%(6.7%-65.2%) 82.5%(56.6%-96.2%) 0.56(0.35–0.75) 50.0%(11.8%-88.2%) 66.7%(43.0%-85.4%) 27
    SEPs 90.0%(55.5%-99.7%) 82.4%(56.6%-96.2%) 0.86(0.66–0.96) 75.0%(42.8%-94.5%) 93.3%(68.1%-99.8%) 27
    MRS 50.0%(18.7%-81.3%) 70.6%(44.0%-89.7%) 0.60(0.39–0.78) 50.0%(18.7%-81.3%) 70.6%(44.0%-89.7%) 27
    NPS# 14.3%(0.4%-57.9%) 66.7%(29.9%-92.5%) 0.40(0.15–0.65) 25.0%(0.6%-80.6%) 50.0%(21.1%-78.9%) 16

This is Table 2 footnote.

BAEPs: brainstem auditory evoked potentials; MRI: Magnetic Resonance imaging; MRS: Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy; NE: neurological examination; NPS: neuropsychological evaluation; NPV: negative predictive value;PPV, positive predictive value; ROC: Receiver operating characteristic;SEPs: somatosensory evoked potentials; VEPs: visual evoked potentials.

#: Neuropsychological evaluation was performed in 16 out of 27 patients either for patient’s refusal or because no neuropsychologist was available the date of planned evaluation.

(*) one-sided, 97.5% confidence interval