Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 15.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Biosyst. 2015 Jun 3;11(8):2167–2179. doi: 10.1039/c5mb00162e

Table 1.

Comparison between the un-, mono- and diphosphorylated tarantula RLC NTE peptides charge, conformation, secondary structure and shape

Head Phosphorylation
level
Net charge RLC shape
according to
the 3D-Map9
HCH
inter-domain
salt bridges
HCH
inter-domain
folding
Helix P
intra-domain
salt bridges
Helix P
extension
Disorder-to-order
transition****
BH Un-P 0 Compact R39/E58-E61 Folded none None No
BH* S45 Mono-P −2 N/A R39/E58-E61 Folded pS45/K37 None No
FH Un-P 0 N/A R39/E58-E61 Folded none None No
FH** S35 Mono-P −2 Less compact none Disrupted pS35/R38-R39-R42 Partial Partial
FH*** S35 & S45 di-P −4 N/A none Disrupted pS35/R38-R39-R42 Full Full
*

Only the free head is constitutively monophosphorylated at Ser35.10, 11 There is no constitutive Ser35 monophosphorylation in the blocked head.10, 11

**

Only the blocked head can be monophosphorylated at Ser45 as the free head is already constitutively monophosphorylated in Ser35. 10, 11

***

Only the free head can be biphosphorylated as it is constitutively monophosphorylated at Ser35 while the blocked head, which is not constitutively monophosphorylated, cannot be diphosphorylated.10, 11

****

Disorder-to-order is used here describe a coil-to-helix transition as originally proposed by Espinoza-Fonseca et al.30, 31

N/A: 3D-map not available, as thick filaments are disordered when activated.5