Table 2.
Pool | Animal ID | Species | Location | Original sample pool Ct | Original sample: individual Ct | Duplicate sample: individual Ct |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 | U95 | C. brachyotis | Puning Cave | 42.0/ND | 41.2/ND | |
U96 | Pt. jagori | Puning Cave | ||||
U97 | Pt. jagori | Puning Cave | ||||
U98 | Pt. jagori | Puning Cave | ||||
U99 | Pt. jagori | Puning Cave | ||||
3 | R1 | M. australis | Biak na Bato | 43.0/ND | ||
R2 | M. australis | Biak na Bato | ||||
R3 | M. australis | Biak na Bato | ||||
R4 | M. australis | Biak na Bato | 39.3/ND | |||
R5 | M. australis | Biak na Bato | ||||
4 | T67 | M. australis | Biak na Bato | 40.6/41.9b | ||
T68 | M. australis | Biak na Bato | ||||
T69 | M. schreibersii c | Biak na Bato | 33.6d | |||
T70 | M. schreibersii c | Biak na Bato | 37.7d | 39.9/ND | ||
T71 | M. schreibersii c | Biak na Bato | 32.9d | 40.1/ND | ||
T72 | M. schreibersii e | Biak na Bato | ||||
T73 | M. schreibersii e | Biak na Bato | ||||
T74 | M. schreibersii e | Biak na Bato | 40.5/ND | |||
T75 | M. schreibersii e | Biak na Bato | ||||
T76 | M. schreibersii e | Biak na Bato | ||||
6 | T56 | Ch. plicata | Biak na Bato | 39.7/40.1b | ||
T57 | Ch. plicata | Biak na Bato | ||||
T58 | Ch. plicata | Biak na Bato | ||||
T59 | Ch. plicata | Biak na Bato | ||||
T60 | M. schreibersii | Biak na Bato | ||||
12 | U21 | M. australis | Biak na Bato | 40.2/ND | 42.2/ND | |
U22 | M. australis | Biak na Bato | ||||
U23 | Ch. plicata | Biak na Bato | ||||
U24 | Ch. plicata | Biak na Bato | ||||
U25 | Ch. plicata | Biak na Bato |
aAll samples were tested in duplicate. Positive samples were confirmed in triplicate
bPools 4 and 6 had repeatable results on the original pooled sample
cT69, T70 and T71 yielded a product on hemi-nested PCR whose sequence differed by one nucleotide from a pig isolate in Bulacan province
dMean value of the duplicates
eAdditional M. schreibersii samples from a pool which tested negative in the original round