Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 16.
Published in final edited form as: Epidemiology. 2014 Jul;25(4):528–535. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000113

Table 1. Analyses Performed to Assess the Effect of Non-Differential Measurement Error in Individual-level Variables Aggregated to Create Neighborhood Contextual Measures in Multi-level Studies.

Form of measurement error Dataset Variations Tested
Dichotomous individual-level
variable: (e.g. non-differential
misclassification of household-level
poverty)
New York City Community
Health Survey
  1. Magnitude of measurement error

  2. Modeling strategy (GEE vs. mixed models)

  3. Outcome form (continuous vs. dichotomous)

  4. Effect estimation (quantile comparison vs. direct interpretation of slope)

Multiple Simulated Datasets
Modeled on the New York
City Community Health
Survey
  1. Effect estimation (externally-defined cut-points)

Continuous individual-level variable:
(e.g. non-differential error in
household-level income)
Multiple Simulated Datasets
Modeled on the New York
City Community Health
Survey
  1. Magnitude of measurement error

  2. Number of neighborhoods

  3. Number of residents per neighborhood

  4. Effect estimation (quantile comparison vs. direct interpretation of slope)