TABLE 2—

Comparisons of HIV Status Groups on Demographic and Risk-Related Characteristics Among Men Who Have Sex With Men and Transgender Women Recruited Through Respondent-Driven Sampling (n = 1000): Bogotá, Colombia, 2011

	HIV Status Group
Characteristic	Negative (n = 876), % or Mean (95% CI)	Positive-Aware (n = 53), % or Mean (95% CI)	Positive-Unaware (n = 71), % or Mean (95% CI)	Test Statistic, χ2(2) or F (2, 997)
Transgender	5.7 (4.2, 7.2)	1.9 (0.0, 5.6)	9.9 (2.9, 16.8)	3.64
Low SESa	83.0 (80.5, 85.5)	77.4 (66.1, 88.6)	83.1 (74.4, 91.8)	1.11
Insurance group
Contributory	29.3 (26.3, 32.4)x	56.6 (43.3, 70.0)y	22.5 (12.8, 32.3)x	19.8***
Subsidized	32.8 (29.7, 36.0)	24.5 (12.9, 36.1)	35.2 (24.1, 46.3)	1.80
Linked, none, or unknown	37.9 (34.7, 41.1)x	18.9 (8.3, 29.4)y	42.3 (30.8, 53.7)x	8.58*
Ever had STI	28.0 (24.3, 30.3)x	67.9 (55.4, 80.5)y	47.9 (36.3, 59.5)z	46.5***
Ever did exchange sexb	27.2 (24.2, 30.1)x	17.0 (6.9, 27.8)x	49.3 (37.7, 60.9)y	19.4***
Binge drinking in past 3 mo	14.6 (12.3, 17.0)x	9.4 (1.6, 17.3)x	28.2 (29.4, 52.3)y	10.8**
Drug use in past 3 mo	26.4 (23.5, 29.4)x	22.6 (14.6, 38.3)x	40.9 (29.4, 52.3)y	7.5*
Condomless anal intercourse in past 3 mo	61.6 (58.4, 64.9)x	37.7 (24.7, 50.8)y	66.2 (55.2, 77.2)x	12.9**
Forced relocation	9.9 (7.9, 11.8)x	26.4 (14.6, 38.3)y	18.3 (9.3, 27.3)y	17.5***
Mean agec	24.2 (23.8, 24.6)x	33.5 (32.2, 35.9)y	26.4 (24.8, 28.0)z	62.4***
Mean experiences of violencec	0.22 (0.20, 0.24)x	0.31 (0.21, 0.42)y	0.33 (0.26, 0.41)y	7.7***

Note. CI = confidence interval; SES = socioeconomic status; STI = sexually transmitted infection. Entries marked with “x, y, or z” are significantly different from each other.

^aStrata 1–3.

^bSexual intercourse in exchange for money, goods, or services.

^cThe corresponding test statistic is F(2, 997).

*P < .05; **P < .01; ***P < .001.