TABLE VI.
Post-hoc Regression Results Comparing the Unaffected Employee Workers’ Compensation Claim Frequency Ratesa Pre- and Post-Intervention, Controlling for Time Trend
| Claim type | Employer count | Per yearc RR (95% CI) | Intervention effectc RR (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All claims | 446 | 0.86 (0.78, 0.95)* | 1.06 (0.88, 1.29) |
| All claims | |||
| By Employer sizeb | |||
| Small | 242 | 0.95 (0.89, 1.01) | 0.89 (0.7, 1.14) |
| Large | 204 | 0.85 (0.76, 0.94)* | 1.10 (0.88, 1.39) |
a
Total number of claims (medical-only and lost-time) per 100 full-time equivalents (FTEs).
b
Number of full- and part-time employees, as reported by the employer to the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services for the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW); Small (1–99 employees); Large (≥100 employees).
c
Poisson regression.
*
Significant difference, P <.05.