Table 3. Didymodon species identified in Tibet, and their relative frequency, coverage, and importance value.
| No. | Species | Relative Frequency | Relative Coverage | Importance value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | Didymodon constrictus var. constrictus | 25.969 | 29.848 | 27.909 |
| S2 | Didymodon tectorus | 9.948 | 6.797 | 8.372 |
| S3 | Didymodon constrictus var. flexicuspis | 7.539 | 3.913 | 5.726 |
| S4 | Didymodon perobtusus | 4.817 | 1.969 | 3.393 |
| S5 | Didymodon rigidulus var. rigidulus | 4.712 | 3.542 | 4.127 |
| S6 | Didymodon tophaceus | 4.712 | 2.935 | 3.824 |
| S7 | Didymodon rigidulus var. icmadophilus | 4.084 | 2.551 | 3.318 |
| S8 | Didymodon nigrescens | 3.874 | 2.423 | 3.149 |
| S9 | Didymodon michiganensis | 3.351 | 1.726 | 2.539 |
| S10 | Didymodon rigidulus var. ditrichoides | 2.827 | 1.375 | 2.101 |
| S11 | Didymodon vinealis | 2.094 | 1.701 | 1.898 |
| S12 | Didymodon rigidulus var. gracilis | 1.780 | 1.100 | 1.440 |
| S13 | Didymodon asperifolius | 1.152 | 0.729 | 0.940 |
| S14 | Didymodon rigidulus var. subulatus | 1.152 | 0.492 | 0.822 |
| S15 | Didymodon ferrugineus | 0.942 | 1.061 | 1.002 |
| S16 | Didymodon fallax | 0.628 | 0.345 | 0.487 |
| S17 | Didymodon giganteus | 0.524 | 0.480 | 0.502 |
| S18 | Didymodon rivicolus | 0.524 | 0.301 | 0.412 |
| S19 | Didymodon rufidulus | 0.209 | 0.850 | 0.530 |
| S20 | Didymodon anserinocapitatus | 0.105 | 0.026 | 0.065 |
| S21 | Didymodon japonicus | 0.105 | 0.032 | 0.068 |
| S22 | Didymodon johansenii | 0.105 | 0.115 | 0.110 |