Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 26;94(25):e991. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000991

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Mean adjusted percentage change (95% CI) in left femoral neck and lumbar BMD in Control (n = 42), Ca (n = 45), MESE (n = 48), MESE + Ca (n = 49) groups. ∗∗P < 0.001 within-group change from baseline. (A) Mean-adjusted percentage change (95% CI) in left femoral neck BMD in Control (n = 42), Ca (n = 45), MESE (n = 48), MESE + Ca (n = 49) groups. The increase in left femoral neck BMD in MESE and MESE + Ca groups was significantly greater than the increases in Ca group (P < 0.001). (B) Mean-adjusted percentage change (95% CI) in lumbar BMD in Control (n = 42), Ca (n = 45), MESE (n = 48), MESE + Ca (n = 49) groups. At lumbar L2 to L4 BMD, there was a significant main effect of MESE exercise (P < 0.001).