Skip to main content
. 2015 May 18;126(3):291–299. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-01-621664

Table 2.

Post hoc OS analyses: results of multivariate Cox models

Covariates HR 95% CI P
Cox model 1, adjusted for baseline covariates*
 Treatment (azacitidine vs CCR) 0.80 0.66-0.99 .0355
 Cytogenetic risk status (intermediate vs poor) 0.42 0.34-0.52 <.0001
 ECOG performance status (0-1 vs 2) 0.62 0.48-0.79 .0001
 BM blasts (%) 1.01 1.01-1.01 <.0001
 Preselected treatment
  BSC vs IC 1.88 1.32-2.69 .0005
  LDAC vs IC 1.14 0.84-1.53 .3990
 Geographic area
  Asia vs Western Europe 1.19 0.86-1.64 .2915
  Eastern Europe vs Western Europe 1.73 1.30-2.31 .0002
  North America/Australia vs Western Europe 1.16 0.88-1.52 .3036
 Age (years) 1.02 1.00-1.04 .0219
 AML classification (AML with myelodysplasia-related changes vs all other AML types) 0.83 0.67-1.03 .0973
Cox model 2, adjusted for subsequent treatment
 Treatment (AZA vs CCR) 0.75 0.59-0.94 .0130
 Subsequent therapy (yes vs no) 1.62 1.16-2.25 .0043
 Treatment × subsequent therapy interaction 2.19 1.40-3.42 .0006
Cox model 3, adjusted for baseline covariates and subsequent treatment
 Treatment (azacitidine vs CCR) 0.69 0.54-0.88 .0027
 Subsequent therapy (yes vs no) 1.67 1.19-2.34 .0028
 Treatment × subsequent therapy interaction 2.75 1.72-4.38 <.0001
 Cytogenetic risk status (intermediate vs poor) 0.41 0.33-0.51 <.0001
 ECOG performance status (0-1 vs 2) 0.60 0.46-0.76 <.0001
 BM blasts (%) 1.01 1.01-1.02 <.0001
 Preselected treatment
  BSC vs IC 2.37 1.64-3.42 <.0001
  LDAC vs IC 1.24 0.92-1.67 .1667
 Geographic area
  Asia vs Western Europe 1.15 0.84-1.59 .3804
  Eastern Europe vs Western Europe 1.84 1.38-2.45 <.0001
  North America/Australia vs Western Europe 1.11 0.84-1.47 .4669
 Age (years) 1.02 1.00-1.04 .0741
AML classification (AML with myelodysplasia-related changes vs all other AML types) 0.81 0.65-1.00 .0554
*

Covariates included in the model were selected by using a stepwise variable selection procedure in which covariates were selected incrementally into a Cox model with the significance level for inclusion set to P ≤ .25. After each addition of a covariate to the model, the contribution of each covariate present in the model at that step was evaluated; significance level for retention in the model was set to P ≤ .15. Patients with a missing value for any covariate in the final model (n = 10 [2.0%]) were excluded from analysis. Additional covariates that were considered for inclusion but that did not meet the criterion for selection into the model were gender (male, female), WBC (continuous, log-transformed), and prior history of MDS (yes or no).

Continuous variables.