Table 1.
Comparison between the Ru/M ratios measured by ICP and XPS before and after thermal activation for clusters 3 to 8 on CNFs and MWNTs.
Cluster | Support | Ru/M calc. | Ru/M from ICP (mol) | Ru/M from XPS | |
Before activation | After activation | ||||
3 | CNF–PPh2 | 6 (Pt) | 4.99 | 3.25 | 2.50 |
MWNT–PPh2 | 5.05 | 2.25 | 1.46 | ||
4 | CNF–PPh2 | 5 (Pt) | 4.37 | 3.16 | 2.43 |
MWNT–PPh2 | 4.52 | 3.34 | 2.02 | ||
5 | CNF–PPh2 | 3 (Au) | 2.12 | 1.86 | 2.89 |
MWNT–PPh2 | 2.61 | 1.32 | 2.08 | ||
6 | CNF–PPh2 | 2.5 (Au) | 2.01 | 1.36 | 4.72 |
MWNT–PPh2 | 2.15 | 1.08 | 1.89 | ||
7 | CNF–PPh2 | 2 (Au) | 1.60 | 0.80 | 4.00 |
MWNT–PPh2 | 1.91 | 0.72 | 1.56 | ||
8 | CNF–PPh2 | 5 (Pt) | 4.59 | 2.98 | 3.03 |
2.5 (Au) | 1.60 | 1.01 | 3.90 | ||
MWNT–PPh2 | 5 (Pt) | 4.40 | 0.78 | 0.41 | |
2.5 (Au) | 1.54 | 0.45 | 0.75 |