Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 3;6(7):2294–2310. doi: 10.1364/BOE.6.002294

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10

A comparison between 2D and 3D techniques. (a) 3D reconstruction of the 8 test stacks. (b) Schematic of the frame-by-frame manner of 2D analysis. Only the top 10 frames are zoomed in here for illustration. (c) Histograms showing the error of the mean θ determination. *, significant difference.