Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 5;6(7):2337–2352. doi: 10.1364/BOE.6.002337

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

FC dynamics derived from HbO (left) and HbR (right) signals. (A) An example of dynamic FC maps displayed at an interval of 4 s on an arbitrary participant (Subject 14). (B) The Pearson “between-map” correlation coefficients, rm, calculated between the successive dynamic FC maps and the static FC map from Subject 14. The dotted straight line represents the mean and standard derivation of rm across the 10-min time window. (C) Similar calculation to (B) on all 18 subjects. The sliding-window length used to evaluate dynamic FC was 60 s.