Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 17;10(7):e0132340. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132340

Table 4. Context of included studies.

Study Country Strength of primary care orientation (of country)* Population Study design (n participants) Study length (months) Brief description of model Extracted outcomes for meta-analysis
Beland 2006a [57]; Beland 2006b [58] Canada intermediate Elderly & functionally disabled RCT; n = 1309 22 Community-based MDTs with full clinical responsibility for delivering and coordinating services. 24-hour availability via phone. Actively followed patients through care trajectory. Utilisation (primary/secondary care)
Bernabei 1998 [59] Italy high# Elderly & receiving home health services/assistance RCT; n = 199 12 MDT-designed care plan following assessment by GP/case manager. Case manager followed-up every two months, and constantly available to deal with problems and monitor provision of services. Mortality, Self-reported health status, Utilisation (primary/secondary care)
Bird 2010 [60] Australia intermediate Frequent presenters for COPD/CHF CBA; n = 124 (COPD)/n = 89 (CHF) 11 Patients allocated to disease-specific stream based on presentations. Results of initial case facilitator assessment discussed at case conference with MDT. Education, self-management, and coordination focus. Follow-up mostly at home Mortality, Utilisation (secondary care)
Boult 2008 [61]; Leff 2009 [62]; Boyd 2010 [63]; Boult 2011 [64]; Boult 2013 [65] USA low Elderly & high-risk multimorbid cRCT; n = 904 32 Nurse responsible for assessing, planning care, monitoring, coaching self-management, coordination of services, and education for patient and family. Helped by team of physicians. Total cost of services, Mortality, Patient satisfaction, Self-reported health status, Utilisation (primary/secondary care)
Boyd 1996 [66] USA low Elderly & chronically ill nRCT; n = 54 12 Community-based, integrating case management in patient’s everyday life, with case manager available to monitor the patient’s chronic illness(es). Developing care plan, coordinating services, and providing counselling support. Mortality
Burns 1995 [67]; Burns 2000 [68] USA low Frail elderly RCT; n = 98 24 Consistent involvement of MDT (GEM team). Initially assess patient and provide ongoing management. Most appropriate team member for given patient served as main liaison. Mortality, Self-reported health status, Utilisation (primary/secondary care)
Coburn 2012 [69] USA low Elderly & chronically ill RCT; n = 1736 60 Patients risk-stratified within intervention. Regardless of strata, nurse developed an individualised care plan. Group interventions were also provided by the care managers. Nurses collaborated with other healthcare professionals when required. Mortality
Counsell 2007 [70]; Counsell 2009 [71] USA low Low income elderly RCT; n = 951 24 Care plan developed in collaboration with MDT. Weekly team meetings to review team successes and problem-solve barriers to implementation. At least monthly home-based care management supported by an electronic medical record and web-based tracking system. Total cost of services, Mortality, Patient satisfaction, Self-reported health status, Utilisation (secondary care)
Dalby 2000 [72] Canada intermediate Frail elderly living in the community RCT; n = 142 14 Nurse-led comprehensive assessment. Care plan developed in conjunction with primary physician. Follow-up visits and calls as needed. Nurse coordinates further community services Mortality, Utilisation (primary/secondary care)
De Stampa 2014 [73] France low Frail elderly CBA; n = 428 12 Two-person team responsible for patient’s care trajectory. The primary care manager developed care plan, ongoing role of physician to collaborate and share information. Support as needed from geriatricians. Self-reported health status, Utilisation (secondary care)
Dorr 2008 [74] USA low Elderly & chronically ill nRCT; n = 3432 24 Case management aimed at addressing social, cognitive, and functional needs. Assisted by specialised IT software including structured protocols and guidelines. Co-creation of care plan with patients. Mortality, Utilisation (secondary care)
Enguidanos 2006 [75] USA low Frail elderly RCT; n = 452 12 Study compares 4 strategies of care. Telephone case management (single case manager); Geriatric care management (GCM) (MDT involvement in care plan); GCM with purchase of service capability (addition of $2000 of designated paid services within first 6 months); Information and referral assistance (most basic, acts as control group). Utilisation (primary/secondary care)
Fan 2012 [76] USA low Frequent presenters for COPD RCT; n = 426 12 Initial individual educational programme, needs assessment, and an overview of COPD. Reinforced during group session, and with follow-up phone calls. Individualised plan for flare-ups, including prescriptions for prednisone and antibiotic. Mortality, Patient satisfaction, Self-reported health status, Utilisation (secondary care)
Fitzgerald 1994 [77] USA low Inpatient medical service users RCT; n = 668 12 Included instructing patients about their medical problems, facilitating access to usual care, and identifying and fulfilling unmet social and medical needs with standard or alternative sources of care. Periodic assessment of medical and social needs. Coordination of all appointments for patient. 24-hour telephone access Mortality, Utilisation (primary/secondary care)
Fordyce 1997 [78] USA low Frail elderly RCT; n = 1090 36 Yearly health, functional, and social evaluation. Weekly team meetings where nurse presented cases for review. Medical-functioning profile worked up for each patient, acting as indication of intensity of follow-up, as needed. Follow-up mostly by telephone. Utilisation (secondary care)
Gagnon 1999 [79] Canada intermediate Frail elderly RCT; n = 427 10 Coordination of all healthcare providers and implementation of a responsive plan of care. Monthly phone calls, and a home visit every 6 weeks were the minimum standard. Additional contacts when required. Specialist consultation available to nurses for complicated cases. Patient satisfaction, Self-reported health status, Utilisation (secondary care)
Gravelle 2007 [80] UK high Frail elderly CBA; n = 7757 (practices) 48 Assessment, using structured assessment tools, a physical examination, which resulted in an individualised care plan. Patients were then monitored at a frequency determined by their classification of risk. Mortality, Utilisation (secondary care)
Hogg 2009 [81]; Gray 2010 [82] Canada intermediate Older & at-risk of adverse outcomes RCT; n = 241 18 Nurses and pharmacist co-located at family practice, but delivered care almost exclusively at patient’s home. Team-developed care plan. 22 patients also received a tele-health system for remote monitoring. Total cost of services, Self-reported health status, Utilisation (primary/secondary care)
Kruse 2010 [83] USA low Elderly & chronically ill, at-risk for catastrophic illness nRCT; n = 379 60 Assessed patient’s needs, provided education, coordinated referrals, provided first-access care and follow-up care following visits to doctor/hospital on the telephone. Mortality, Utilisation (primary/secondary care)
Leung 2004 [84] Hong Kong intermediate^ Community-dwelling frail elderly RCT; n = 260 6 Regular home-visits and telephone consultations. Care plan designed in discussion with patient and caregiver. Coordination of health and social services through referral plus case conference. Monitoring of health and hospitalisation patterns via computer programme. Counselling, health education, and supportive group services. Self-reported health status, Utilisation (primary/secondary care)
Levine 2012 [85] USA low Elderly & multimorbid, at-risk for hospitalisation RCT; n = 298 12 Included early identification and treatment of illness exacerbation, patient-specific health education, self or caregiver management of disease, and advance care planning and other psychosocial issues. Team worked closely at all stages. Total cost of services, Patient satisfaction, Utilisation (primary/secondary care)
Martin 2004 [86] New Zealand intermediate+ Acutely deteriorating COPD patients RCT; n = 93 12 Generic care plan was individualised and signed off. Supplies of antibiotics and prednisone made available. Copies of plan held by each potential provider of care. Routine support and further education available. Utilisation (primary/secondary care)
Metzelthin 2013[87] The Netherlands high Frail elderly cRCT; n = 346 24 Core team (GP and nurse) cooperate closely with other health professionals as needed. Initial home-visit and assessment, meeting to design care plan, and treatment starts with protocol offering recommendations and guidelines. Self-reported health status
Morishita 1998 [88]; Boult 2001 [89] USA low Elderly & high-risk RCT; n = 568 18 Consistent involvement of MDT (GEM team). Specialised GEM clinic introduced, where patients were followed-up. Individual team members saw patients approximately monthly, met to discuss. Regular telephone calls, and available 24-hours on telephone service Total cost of services, Mortality, Patient satisfaction, Self-reported health status, Utilisation (primary care)
Newcomer 2004 [90] USA low High-risk elderly RCT; n = 3079 12 Patients triaged by risk category after initial assessment. Predominant method of contact was telephone, supplemented by monitoring utilisation. Nurse case manager distributed educational material and advice, coordinated services, but no direct role in treatment management. Self-reported health status, Utilisation (primary/secondary care)
Ploeg 2010 [91] Canada intermediate Elderly & at-risk of functional decline RCT; n = 719 12 Nurse-led comprehensive initial assessment, collaborative care planning, health promotion, and referral to community health and social support services. Assessments at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Additional health education and referrals to other health services. Total cost of services, Mortality, Self-reported health status, Utilisation (primary/secondary care)
Rodenas 2008 [92] Spain high Elderly & receiving home care RCT; n = 152 12 Direct interaction with the patients was carried out by a MDT. The team took charge of: 1) assessing individual needs 2) designing and starting individual care itineraries 3) benefit quality assurance, and 4) monitoring and on-going review of the strategy. Extra health and social care resources were also available for the intervention group. Patient satisfaction, Utilisation (primary/secondary care)
Rubenstein 2007 [93] USA low High-risk elderly RCT; n = 793 36 Initial telephone assessment by physician assistant case manager. Some patients referred for further assessment and an interdisciplinary care plan at a geriatric assessment unit. Coordination of follow-up by phone, each patient mailed a copy of the care plan. Self-reported health status, Utilisation (secondary care)
Schraeder 2001 [94] USA low Community-dwelling elderly RCT; n = 941 24 Team's goal was to provide enhanced primary care by providing assessments, flexible home office visits, detailed care planning, routine telephone monitoring, and coordination and procurement of supportive services. Nurse and care assistant co-located. Total cost of services, Mortality, Utilisation (secondary care)
Schraeder 2008 [95] USA low Community-dwelling, chronically ill elderly nRCT; n = 677 36 Intervention emphasised collaboration between physicians, nurses and patients, risk identification, comprehensive assessment, collaborative planning, health monitoring, patient education, and transitional care. Nurse and care assistant co-located. Utilisation (secondary care)
Shannon 2006 [96]; Alkema 2007 [97] USA low Elderly & high utilisers RCT; n = 781 12 Telephone-based management to coordinate services bridging medical and social care. Focus on referrals. Monthly follow-up calls. Mortality, Utilisation (primary/secondary care)
Sledge 2006 [98] USA low Recent high use of inpatient services RCT; n = 96 12 PIC intervention consisted of two components: 1) a comprehensive interdisciplinary medical and psychosocial assessment (2–3 hours on first visit), and 2) follow-up ambulatory case management for 1 year. Involvement differed by need, but minimum monthly call. Total cost of services, Mortality, Patient satisfaction, Self-reported health status, Utilisation (primary/secondary care)
Stuck 2000 [99] Switzerland low# In-home visits for disability prevention RCT; n = 791 36 Annual nurse-led comprehensive assessments. Cases discussed with geriatrician and recommendations developed. In-home follow-up visits every 3 months. Nurses also provided health education, encouraged self-care, and attempted to improve communication with the physician. Interdisciplinary team available to discuss complex patients. Mortality, Self-reported health status, Utilisation (secondary care)
Sylvia 2008 [100]; Boyd 2008 [101] USA low Community-dwelling, chronically ill, elderly nRCT; n = 127 6 At-home assessment, evidence-based care plan, promotion of self-management, monthly monitoring, coaching on healthy behaviours, coordination of transitions in care, and facilitating access to community resources. Total cost of services, Patient satisfaction, Utilisation (primary/secondary care)
Toseland 1996 [102]; Toseland 1997 [103]; Engelhardt 1996 [104]; Engelhardt 2006 [105] USA low Frail elderly RCT; n = 160 48 Primary functions of the GEM team included: initial comprehensive assessment; development of a care plan; implementation of the care plan; periodic reassessment; monitoring and updating the care plan, and; referral to and coordination with other health and social service providers. Weekly team meetings to discuss. Total cost of services, Mortality, Patient satisfaction, Self-reported health status, Utilisation (primary/secondary care)
van Hout 2010 [106] The Netherlands high Community-dwelling frail elderly RCT; n = 651 18 Assessment of health and care needs, recommended interventions based on guidelines, individually tailored care plans (copy left at patient’s home for other care workers to see/add to). Home visits at least 4 times a year. Mortality, Self-reported health status, Utilisation (secondary care)

* Source: Starfield et al 2002 [31], unless otherwise stated

# Source: Macinko et al 2003 [107]

+ Source: Grant et al 1997 [108]

^ Source: Fry & Horder 1994 [109]