Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 21;21(27):8441–8451. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i27.8441

Table 1.

Characteristics of included studies

Laparoscopic liver resection
Robotic liver resection
Ref. Country Type of study Total n. of patients No. of patients Age M/F No. of patients Age M/F Score of study quality2
Berber et al[21] United States Retro/Comparative 32 23 66.7 ± 9.6 12/11 9 66.6 ± 6.4 7/2 4+2+3
Ji et al[30] China Retro/Case-control 33 20 NR NR 13 53 (39-79)1 9/4 3+1+3
Troisi et al[45] Belgium-Italy Retro/Comparative 263 223 55.3 ± 15.7 98/125 40 64.6 ± 12.1 27/13 4+1+3
Lai et al[41] China Retro/Comparative 66 33 NR NR 33 NR NR 4+1+3
Wu et al[47] Taiwan Retro/Comparative 79 41 54.1 ± 14 28/13 38 60.9 ± 14.9 32/6 4+1+3
Tsung et al[46] United States Retro/Case-control 171 114 58.7 ± 15.8 47/67 57 58.3 ± 14.6 24/33 3+2+3
Spampinato et al[43] Italy Retro/Comparative 50 25 62 (33-80)1 10/15 25 63 (32-80) 13/12 4+2+3
1

Data expressed as median (range);

2

According to the NOS (Newcastle-Ottawa Scale) classification. Retro: Retrospective; NR: Not reported.