Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 1;24(7):563–571. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2014.5016

Table 3.

Associations of Material Hardship with Gestational Weight Gain Category (Institute of Medicine 1990) Among 2128 Women in Project Viva

  Gestational weight gain categoryOR (95% CI) vs. adequate GWGb
  Inadequate childhood hardship Excessive childhood hardship
Modela Yes (n=32) No (n=287) Yes (n=108) No (n=954)
0 1.48 (0.88–2.48) 1.0 (reference) 1.50 (1.03–2.19) 1.0 (reference)
1 1.26 (0.74–2.15) 1.0 (reference) 1.45 (0.99–2.14) 1.0 (reference)
2 1.23 (0.72–2.11) 1.0 (reference) 1.47 (0.99–2.17) 1.0 (reference)
  Adulthood hardship Adulthood hardship
  Yes (n=29) No (n=290) Yes (n=39) No (n=1023)
0 2.15 (1.17–3.97) 1.0 (reference) 0.82 (0.48–1.39) 1.0 (reference)
1 1.55 (0.81–2.96) 1.0 (reference) 0.72 (0.41–1.26) 1.0 (reference)
2 1.44 (0.75–2.78) 1.0 (reference) 0.71 (0.40–1.25) 1.0 (reference)
  Pregnancy hardship Pregnancy hardship
  Yes (n=12) No (n=307) Yes (n=18) No (n=1044)
0 2.47 (0.92–6.60) 1.0 (reference) 1.10 (0.45–2.69) 1.0 (reference)
1 1.91 (0.68–5.34) 1.0 (reference) 1.09 (0.43–2.76) 1.0 (reference)
2 1.82 (0.64–5.19) 1.0 (reference) 1.12 (0.44–2.88) 1.0 (reference)
a

Model 0: unadjusted; Model 1: adjusted for maternal age, race/ethnicity, parity and prepregnancy BMI; Model 2: model 1 additionally adjusted for education, marital status, and household income.

b

Sample sizes for adequate GWG: childhood hardship yes=52 and no=695, adult hardship yes=34 and no=714, pregnancy hardship yes=12 and no=735.

CI, confidence interval; GWG, gestational weight gain; OR, odds ratio.