Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 20.
Published in final edited form as: Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2012 Feb 23;8313:83131S. doi: 10.1117/12.911202

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Comparison of different reconstruction methods for the 2D deformable component scenario. Zoomed versions of each case are shown in the lower row of images. While the FBP image is plagued by significant streak artifacts, there is significant reduction of streaks when a statistical approach is used. However, the penalized-likelihood approach still exhibits difficulty resolving details near the boundary of the simulated device; whereas the dKCR approach provides improved quality, better resolving a simulated fracture. We note that not only is image quality improved through the introduction of component knowledge, the deformations estimated by the dKCR approach provide an accurate estimate of the particular deformations that were applied to the component.