Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 11;15(6):13763–13777. doi: 10.3390/s150613763

Table 3.

Water body classification comparison of three algorithms.

Place Methods OA (%) Kappa
Area 1 Otsu threshold 98.31 0.920227
Area 2 Otsu threshold 99.94 0.997037
Area 3 Otsu threshold 99.68 0.979753
Average 99.31 0.965672
Area 1 SVM 99.19 0.960726
Area 2 SVM 99.83 0.99122
Area 3 SVM 99.90 0.993993
Average 99.64 0.98198
Area 1 RF 99.82 0.990937
Area 2 RF 99.40 0.967351
Area 3 RF 99.86 0.991213
Average 99.69 0.983167
Area 1 Proposed method 99.88 0.993539
Area 2 Proposed method 99.90 0.994273
Area 3 Proposed method 99.92 0.994965
Average 99.90 0.994259