Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 16;15(6):14180–14206. doi: 10.3390/s150614180

Table 2.

Extract of the comparison of different lists of QoC criteria [12].

buchholz 2003 [3] kim 2006 [13] sheikh 2007 [6] filho 2010 [14] manzoor 2012 [15] neisse 2012 [10]
1 Probability context is free of errors Correctness Accuracy Precision Accuracy Precision

5 Time between production of contexts Temporal resolution Time period

6 Date of collection of context Measurement time Timestamps

10 Closeness, Repeatability of measurements (ISO) Precision

11 Granularity (detail level) of context Precision Precision Sensitiveness Usability

15 Validity of context based on freshness Up todateness(6) Up todateness(6) Freshness (6) Up todateness(5, 6) Timeliness (5, 6)

Inline graphic Meaning used by all authors; Name: Name only defined by one author; Name: Name defined by different authors for different meanings; Name: Name defined by different authors for the same meaning; Name (X): The definition of this criterion depends on the X criterion; ✓: Criterion not defined by author but another criterion depends on it.