Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul;13(4):364–366. doi: 10.1370/afm.1780

Table 2.

Performance of Our Filters Compared With That of Other Published Filters for Family Medicine/ General Practice

Our Filters Other Published Filters

Standard Useda Sensitive Filter Specific Filter Primary Health Care Search Filter4 Jelercic et al7 Glanville et al6 Gill et al5 High Sensitivity Gill et al5 Balanced Gill et al5 High Specificity
Review
Sensitivity, % 100.0 90.7 81.4 46.5 95.3 95.3 93.0 88.4
Specificity, % 69.2 97.9 99.0 94.4 77.0 61.0 99.1 99.5
Reference
Sensitivity, % 95.4 83.9 65.9 78.0 84.3 85.9 68.9 57.0
Specificity, % 69.5 94.8 96.3 89.4 89.4 47.6 96.7 98.6
Questionnaire
Sensitivity, % 97.4 96.0 81.4 87.4 97.0 96.2 92.2 78.0
Specificity, % 89.5 99.3 99.0 97.8 96.1 84.9 99.4 99.8
Overall
Sensitivity, % 96.8 90.3 80.8 81.9 92.3 91.9 83.7 70.9
Specificity, % 74.9 97.4 98.3 94.3 83.6 65.0 98.7 99.4
a

Review: created during the screening process of a family medicine–relevant systematic review. Reference: created by 2 independent reviewers (D.H.J.P. and F.A.L.). Questionnaire: created by sending an e-mail to the list of the Cochrane Primary Health Care Field.