Skip to main content
. 2015 May 23;2:444–447. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.05.008

Table 2.

Level of agreement with statements about extending the cervical cancer screening interval to 3 years after a normal co-testa, according to screening interval recommendations, among 82 providers at Federally Qualified Health Centers, Illinois, 2009–2010.

Recommend 1-year interval (%) (n = 57) Recommend 3-year interval (%) (n = 25) p-Value
Extending the screening interval would… Result in patient not visiting annually for other screening tests (reverse) Agree 75 80 0.555
Neither 7 12
Disagree 18 8
Put patient at increased risk for cervical cancer Agree 40 12 0.036
Neither 23 32
Disagree 37 56
Result in higher rates of cervical pre-cancer Agree 35 20 0.055
Neither 23 12
Disagree 42 68
Cause patients to lose contact with medical care system Agree 68 48 0.088
Neither 9 24
Disagree 23 28
Do the following entities encourage or discourage you to extend the screening interval? Patients Discourage 18 40 0.105
Neither 67 48
Encourage 16 12
Colleagues Discourage 28 16 0.165
Neither 47 40
Encourage 25 44
Clinic administration Discourage 21 20 0.126
Neither 65 56
Encourage 14 24
Professional journals Discourage 16 0 0.000
Neither 36 20
Encourage 47 80
Professional specialty organizations Discourage 20 0 0.000
Neither 36 20
Encourage 45 80
National health organizations Discourage 16 0 0.051
Neither 31 24
Encourage 53 76

Significance of associations between these two interval recommendations and beliefs was tested with ordered logistic regression and adjusted for clustered sampling design. No missing data.

a

Co-test (simultaneous Pap and human papillomavirus test).