Table 2.
Recommend 1-year interval (%) (n = 57) | Recommend 3-year interval (%) (n = 25) | p-Value | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Extending the screening interval would… | Result in patient not visiting annually for other screening tests (reverse) | Agree | 75 | 80 | 0.555 |
Neither | 7 | 12 | |||
Disagree | 18 | 8 | |||
Put patient at increased risk for cervical cancer | Agree | 40 | 12 | 0.036 | |
Neither | 23 | 32 | |||
Disagree | 37 | 56 | |||
Result in higher rates of cervical pre-cancer | Agree | 35 | 20 | 0.055 | |
Neither | 23 | 12 | |||
Disagree | 42 | 68 | |||
Cause patients to lose contact with medical care system | Agree | 68 | 48 | 0.088 | |
Neither | 9 | 24 | |||
Disagree | 23 | 28 | |||
Do the following entities encourage or discourage you to extend the screening interval? | Patients | Discourage | 18 | 40 | 0.105 |
Neither | 67 | 48 | |||
Encourage | 16 | 12 | |||
Colleagues | Discourage | 28 | 16 | 0.165 | |
Neither | 47 | 40 | |||
Encourage | 25 | 44 | |||
Clinic administration | Discourage | 21 | 20 | 0.126 | |
Neither | 65 | 56 | |||
Encourage | 14 | 24 | |||
Professional journals | Discourage | 16 | 0 | 0.000 | |
Neither | 36 | 20 | |||
Encourage | 47 | 80 | |||
Professional specialty organizations | Discourage | 20 | 0 | 0.000 | |
Neither | 36 | 20 | |||
Encourage | 45 | 80 | |||
National health organizations | Discourage | 16 | 0 | 0.051 | |
Neither | 31 | 24 | |||
Encourage | 53 | 76 |
Significance of associations between these two interval recommendations and beliefs was tested with ordered logistic regression and adjusted for clustered sampling design. No missing data.
Co-test (simultaneous Pap and human papillomavirus test).