Table 2B.
Authors | Sample (drop-offs excluded) | Stimulation sessions | Stimulation site | Treatment | Daily pulses | Findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Eichhammer et al., 2007 | 17 HC 14 HC |
5 5 |
Left STG sham |
1 Hz, 110% RMT | 2000 2000 |
↑ CSP in the verum group ↔ RMT, SICI, ICF |
Lee et al., 2013 | 21 HC 5 HC |
5 | Right MTG sham |
1 Hz, 110% RMT | 1800 | ↑ MEP, ↓ CSP in the verum group ↔ RMT, SICI, and ICF |
Langguth et al., 2007 | 10 TI | 5 | STG | 1 Hz, 110% RMT sham |
2000 | ↑ SICI, ICF, CSP associated with treatment response in the verum condition |
Schecklmann et al., 2014 | 68 TI 26 TI 22 TI |
10 | AC AC Left DLPFC+ AC |
1 Hz, 110% RMT 1 Hz, 110% RMT 20 Hz+1 Hz, 110% RMT |
2000 4000 2000+2000 |
↑ RMT for all subjects ↓ SICI in responders ↔ ICF, CSP |
Studies were listed according to specific samples and within the groups to stimulation frequency.
HC, healthy controls; TI, tinnitus; AC, auditory cortex; DLPFC, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; MTG, middle temporal gyrus; STG, superior temporal gyrus; ↑, increases; ↔, no changes; ↓, decreases; CSP, cortical silent period; ICF, intracortical facilitation; MEP, motor evoked potential; RMT, resting motor threshold; SICI, short-interval intracortical inhibition; please note that increases in SICI means increases in inhibition and concomitantly a numeric decrease in the raw data.