Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 21;9:416. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00416

Table 2B.

Overview of study parameters of temporal cortex rTMS studies investigating motor cortex excitability.

Authors Sample (drop-offs excluded) Stimulation sessions Stimulation site Treatment Daily pulses Findings
Eichhammer et al., 2007 17 HC
14 HC
5
5
Left STG
sham
1 Hz, 110% RMT 2000
2000
↑ CSP in the verum group
↔ RMT, SICI, ICF
Lee et al., 2013 21 HC
5 HC
5 Right MTG
sham
1 Hz, 110% RMT 1800 ↑ MEP, ↓ CSP in the verum group
↔ RMT, SICI, and ICF
Langguth et al., 2007 10 TI 5 STG 1 Hz, 110% RMT
sham
2000 ↑ SICI, ICF, CSP associated with treatment response in the verum condition
Schecklmann et al., 2014 68 TI
26 TI
22 TI
10 AC
AC
Left DLPFC+ AC
1 Hz, 110% RMT
1 Hz, 110% RMT
20 Hz+1 Hz, 110% RMT
2000
4000
2000+2000
↑ RMT for all subjects
↓ SICI in responders
↔ ICF, CSP

Studies were listed according to specific samples and within the groups to stimulation frequency.

HC, healthy controls; TI, tinnitus; AC, auditory cortex; DLPFC, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; MTG, middle temporal gyrus; STG, superior temporal gyrus; ↑, increases; ↔, no changes; ↓, decreases; CSP, cortical silent period; ICF, intracortical facilitation; MEP, motor evoked potential; RMT, resting motor threshold; SICI, short-interval intracortical inhibition; please note that increases in SICI means increases in inhibition and concomitantly a numeric decrease in the raw data.