Table 4.
Combinations of studies with similar study designs.
Authors | Sample size | Days treated | Stimulation frequency (Hz) | Stimulation intensity (% RMT) | Daily pulses | Findings for the RMT |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shajahan et al., 2002 | 15 | 10 | 5, 10, 20 | 80 | 500 | ↑ |
Chistyakov et al., 2005 | 18 | 10 | 10 | 100 | 500 | ↑ |
Pretalli et al., 2012 | 75 | 10 | 10 | 95 | 1200 | ↔ |
Dolberg et al., 2002 | 46 | 20 | 10 | 90 | 1200 | ↔ |
Bajbouj et al., 2005 | 30 | 10 | 20 | 100 | 2000 | ↔ |
Triggs et al., 1999 | 9 | 10 | 20 | 80 | 2000 | ↓ |
Zarkowski et al., 2009 | 50 | 15 | 10 | 120 | 3000 | ↔ |
Croarkin et al., 2012 | 7 | 25 | 10 | 120 | 3000 | ↓ |
Spampinato et al., 2013 | 12 | 20 | 10 | 120 | 3000 | ↔ |
All studies stimulated the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in only patients with affective disorders. Variable of interest was the resting motor threshold.
RMT, resting motor threshold; ↑, increases; ↔, no changes; ↓, decreases in RMT over the course of the repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.