Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 11;119(9):5921–5933. doi: 10.1002/2014JC010158

Table 2.

Comparison of Methodologies by Previous and Present Efforts to Produce Trend Maps From Different Sensors and Time Records

Authors Years Sensor/Processing Version (PV) Initial Data Analysis Resolution Special Treatment Trend Analysis
Gregg et al. [2005] 1998–2003 SeaWiFS 9 km monthly means 25 km Linear regression
PV: 2003 Annual mean anomalies (n = 6)
Henson et al. [2010] 1997–2007 SeaWiFS 9 km monthly means Spatial resolution unknown Linear regression
PV: V5.2 Monthly mean anomalies
 (n = 124)
Vantrepotte and Melin [2011] 1997–2007 SeaWiFS 9 km monthly means 27 km at equator Selective data removal, gap filling (PCA) Census X-11
PV: R2009 Monthly means
 (n=120)
Siegel et al. [2013] 1997–2010 SeaWiFS 9 km monthly means 1° × 1° Logarithmic transformation, treatment of detrital material Linear regression
PV: 2010 Monthly mean anomalies (n = 154)
This effort 1998–2012 SeaWiFS 1998–2002 1.25° × 0.67° monthly means (after bias correction and data assimilation) 1.25° × 0.67° annual medians (n = 15) Bias correction, data assimilation, end point bias removal, medians, treatment of aerosols Linear regression
PV: 2010
MODIS
 2003–2012
PV: 2013