Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 19;119(3):264–285. doi: 10.1002/2012JG002271

Table 1.

Depth Integrated Process Rates of the Model With its Standard Deviation Compared to the Observed Rates

Depth Integrated Rates Equation and Stoichiometry Model Observed Rate
Sulfate reduction (mmol S m−2 d−1)a (in ( ) as mmol C m−2 d−1)c A4 0.36 ± 0.02 (0.75 ± 0.10) 0.28 – 1.00d
Heterotrophic denitrification (heterotrophic nitrite reduction to N2) (mmol N m−2 d−1)b (in ( ) as mmol C m−2 d−1)c A3 0.23 ± 0.05 (0.27 ± 0.01) n.d.
Sulfide-driven denitrification (sulfide oxidation coupled to nitrite reduction) (mmol N m−2 d−1)b A11 0.13 ± 0.02 n.d.
Canonical denitrification (heterotrophic denitrification + sulfide-driven denitrification) (mmol N m−2 d−1) A3 + A11 0.36 ± 0.06b 0.10 – 0.22b; 1.20 – 3.80e
Heterotrophic nitrate reduction to nitrite (mmol N m−2 d−1)b (in ( ) as mmol C m−2 d−1)c A2 3.21 ± 0.54 (0.97 ± 0.05) 4.70 – 9.90f
Total organic C remineralization (mmol C m−2 d−1)c A1 to A4 2.08 ± 0.22 1.00 – 2.50g
Anammox (mmol N m−2 d−1) A20 0.53 ± 0.05b 0.70 – 1.21b,d; 0.14h
Primary productivity (g C m−2 d−1) 3.13 2.00 – 3.50i
Surface nitrogen fixation (µmol N m−2 d−1) 16.19 7.5 – 190j
a

Integrated from 85 to 150 m.

b

From 73.5 to 173 m for comparison with Canfield et al. [2010].

c

Integrated from 100 to 170 m for internal model comparison.

d

Canfield et al. [2010].

e

Estimated from Dalsgaard et al. [2012] for observations at ∼14°S (integrated from 75 to 150 m) and ∼26°S (integrated from 90 to 150 m) in February 2007.

f

Estimated from Peruvian OMZ [Lam et al., 2009].

g

Estimated from Escribano et al. [2004].

h

Estimated from Dalsgaard et al. [2012] for observations at ∼20°S (integrated from 50 to 100 m) in February 2007.

i

Carr and Kearns [2003].

j

Fernandez et al. [2011].

n.d.: no data.