Skip to main content
. 2015 May 15;8(5):6638–6649.

Table 3.

Association between PNPLA3 rs748309 polymorphisms and development of HCC in patients with cirrhosis

Study group Simple size (Case/Control) Genetic models I2 (%) Ph Effect-model OR [95% CI] P
Overall 461/876 Allele contrast G vs. C 0 0.43 Fixed 1.39 [1.17, 1.64] 0.0001
Dominant model GG + CG vs. CC 5 0.35 Fixed 1.30 [1.03, 1.65] 0.03
Recessive model GG vs. CG + CC 0 0.78 Fixed 1.91 [1.41, 2.58] <0.0001
Co-dominant model GG vs. CC 0 0.52 Fixed 2.00 [1.43, 2.79] <0.0001
CG vs. CC 4 0.35 Fixed 1.14 [0.89, 1.48] 0.30
Over-dominant model GG + CC vs. CG 0 0.54 Fixed 1.12 [0.88,1.41] 0.36
Alcohol 212/425 Allele contrast G vs. C 0 0.61 Fixed 1.82 [1.43, 2.32] <0.0001
Dominant model GG + CG vs. CC 0 0.5 Fixed 1.87 [1.28, 2.73] 0.001
Recessive model GG vs. CG + CC 0 0.55 Fixed 2.65 [1.75, 4.02] <0.00001
Co-dominant model GG vs. CC 0 0.37 Fixed 3.28 [2.01, 5.35] <0.00001
CG vs. CC 0 0.48 Fixed 1.45 [0.96, 2.17] 0.08
Over-dominant model GG + CC vs. CG 0 0.56 Fixed 1.13 [0.80, 1.58] 0.49
HCV 226/398 Allele contrast G vs. C 19 0.29 Fixed 1.10 [0.86, 1.42] 0.44
Dominant model GG + CG vs. CC 0 0.42 Fixed 1.09 [0.78, 1.53] 0.62
Recessive model GG vs. CG + CC 0 0.46 Fixed 1.22 [0.74, 1.99] 0.43
Co-dominant model GG vs. CC 9 0.33 Fixed 1.23 [0.73, 2.07] 0.43
CG vs. CC 0 0.63 Fixed 1.05 [0.73, 1.52] 0.78
Over-dominant model GG + CC vs. CG 0 0.85 Fixed 1.01 [0.71, 1.43] 0.97