Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 10;10(2):1159–1165. doi: 10.3892/ol.2015.3356

Table III.

Pooled OR data obtained in the current meta-analysis.

Contrast model Studies, n OR (95% CI) P-value Model I2, % P-value
Total studies
  Homozygous 27 1.39 (1.20–1.62) <0.001 Random 41.5   0.011
  Heterozygous 27 1.18 (1.05–1.32)   0.006 Random 47.3   0.003
  Recessive 27 1.26 (1.12–1.42) <0.001 Random 34.1   0.039
  Dominant 27 1.23 (1.10–1.38) <0.001 Random 52.8   0.016
Caucasian
  Homozygous 12 1.15 (0.89–1.48)   0.791 Random 58.2   0.006
  Homozygous (adjusted for heterogeneity) 10 1.13 (0.93–1.36)   0.215 Fixed 10.6   0.345
  Heterozygous 12 1.03 (0.84–1.25) <0.001 Fixed   0.0   0.674
  Recessive 12 1.09 (0.91–1.31)   0.367 Fixed 32.1   0.134
  Dominant 12 1.05 (0.86–1.28)   0.609 Random 63.3   0.002
  Dominant (adjusted for heterogeneity) 10 1.00 (0.88–1.14)   0.968 Fixed 27.6 0.19
Asian
  Homozygous 17 1.64 (1.43–1.90) <0.001 Fixed   0.0   0.674
  Heterozygous 17 1.30 (1.16–1.45) <0.001 Fixed   2.6   0.423
  Recessive 17 1.41 (1.25–1.61) <0.001 Fixed   8.1   0.361
  Dominant 17 1.39 (1.25–1.54) <0.001 Fixed   0.0   0.729

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; I2, index of heterogeneity.