Table 3.
Value | SE | P Value | |
---|---|---|---|
SOM pairs | |||
R2 | 0.54 | 0.18 | <10−6 |
Intercept | −0.10 | 0.11 | 0.36 |
ECC β | 0.65 | 0.10 | <10−6 |
Driver rate β | 0.30 | 0.10 | 0.005 |
FS pairs | |||
R2 | 0.60 | 0.15 | <10−6 |
Intercept | −0.07 | 0.06 | 0.24 |
uIPSP β | 0.53 | 0.08 | <10−6 |
ECC β | 0.31 | 0.08 | 0.0001 |
Driver rate β | 0.27 | 0.08 | 0.002 |
FS pairs | |||
R2 | 0.64 | 0.14 | <10−6 |
Intercept | −0.10 | 0.05 | 0.07 |
uIPSP β | 0.45 | 0.07 | <10−6 |
Coupled Y/N? β | 0.38 | 0.07 | 1×10−6 |
Driver rate β | 0.30 | 0.08 | 0.0002 |
Multiple linear regression of the Jitter-Based Synchrony Index (JBSI) shows relative contributions of electrical coupling (ECC, electrical coupling coefficient), inhibitory synaptic connections (unitary IPSP, uIPSP), and driver firing rate to pairwise synchrony in SOM (N = 49 pairs) and FS (N = 80 pairs) interneurons. Replacing the ECC in FS cells with a categorical variable (coupled/not coupled; 2nd set of data for FS pairs) increased the R2 value and approximately equalized the contributions of electrical and chemical coupling (see text).