Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 21.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Lipidol. 2011;6(1):9–20. doi: 10.2217/clp.10.84

Table 3.

Comparison of lipid subgroup analyses in fibrate trials.

Study (drug) CVD reduction
-entire cohort
(p-value)
Lipid
subgroup
HDL-C criteria
Lipid subgroup
triglyceride
criteria
CVD reduction
– lipid
subgroup
(p-value)
Ref.
HHS (gemfibrozil) −34% (0.02) <1.09 mmol/l
(<42 mg/dl)
≥2.31 mmol/l
(≥204 mg/dl)
−78% (0.002) [36,42]
VA-HIT
(gemfibrozil)
−22% (0.006) - ≥2.03 mmol/l
(≥180 mg/dl)
−28% (<0.05) [39,44]
BIP(bezafibrate) −7.3% (0.24) - ≥2.26 mmol/l
(≥200 mg/dl)
−39.5% (0.02) [40]
FIELD (fenofibrate) −11% (0.16) Men:
<1.04 mmol/l
(<40 mg/dl)
Women
<1.30 mmol/l
(<50 mg/dl)
≥2.31 mmol/l
(≥204 mg/dl)
−27% (0.005) [25,49]
ACCORD
(fenofibrate)
−8% (0.26) ≤0.88 mmol/l
(≤34 mg/dl)
≥2.31 mmol/l
(≥204 mg/dl)
−31% (0.032) [4,54]

Percentage reductions in cardiovascular event rates within fibrate trials are presented for both the entire study cohort and subgroups defined by hypertriglyceridemia and/or low HDL-C There is a consistent finding of reduced cardiovascular outcomes in these trials in subgroups defined by the presence of hypertriglyceridemia and low HDL-C regardless of whether the overall outcome was positive or negative.

BMI >26 kg/m2.

CVD: Cardiovascular disease.