Table 2.
Cardiometabolic risk factors | Girls |
Boys |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | Odds ratio | 95% CI | n | Odds ratio | 95% CI | |
High-risk metabolic clustera | ||||||
Model 1 | 608 | 1.04 | (1.00, 1.22) | 646 | 1.19 | (1.02, 1.39) |
Model 2 | 558 | 1.03 | (0.87, 1.22) | 605 | 1.20 | (1.01, 1.41) |
Overweight/obeseb | ||||||
Model 1 | 754 | 0.90 | (0.80, 1.01) | 784 | 1.00 | (0.90, 1.01) |
Model 2 | 649 | 1.02 | (0.87, 1.19) | 699 | 1.04 | (0.90, 1.20) |
High-waist circumferencec | ||||||
Model 1 | 746 | 1.00 | (0.90, 1.02) | 781 | 1.00 | (0.90, 1.01) |
Model 2 | 643 | 1.13 | (0.97, 1.32) | 697 | 1.08 | (0.95, 1.22) |
Model 3 | 643 | 1.28 | (1.00, 1.63) | 697 | 1.00 | (0.82, 1.22) |
Model 1 was adjusted for age and dietary misreporting.
Model 2 was adjusted for age, dietary misreporting, physical fitness and smoking status.
Model 3 was adjusted for age, dietary misreporting, physical fitness, smoking status and BMI z-score.
Composite indicator of an overall metabolic risk (23).
Overweight/obese as defined by the IOTF criteria (25).
High-waist circumference was defined as waist circumference ≥80 cm (26).