TABLE 1.
Growth medium and gene status | Condition and no. of genesa |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
WT vs AbpA− mutant |
Amylase vs control |
|||
KS1ΩabpA vs KS1 | KS1ΩabpA vs KS1 | KS1 | KS1ΩabpA | |
TSBY | No amylase | Amylase | Denatured amylase | Denatured amylase |
Genes upregulated | 0 | 1 | NS | NS |
Genes downregulated | 12 | 9 | NS | NS |
DM–0.8% glucose | No amylase | Amylase | Denatured amylase | Denatured amylase |
Genes upregulated | 97 | 34 | 54 | NS |
Genes downregulated | 69 | 39 | 51 | NS |
DM–0.2% glucose | No amylase | Amylase | Buffer | Buffer |
Genes upregulated | ND | 3 | 13 | 2 |
Genes downregulated | ND | 11 | 4 | 3 |
For KS1ΩabpA-versus-KS1 values, the control was the KS1 parental strain. For the amylase-versus-control values, the control was heat-denatured amylase (100°C for 15 min) diluted in simulated salivary buffer when using denatured amylase or simulated salivary buffer (21 mM sodium phosphate buffer, 36 mM NaCl, 0.96 mM CaCl2) when using buffer. NS, not significant after Benjamini-Hochberg correction (P > 0.05); ND, analysis not done.