Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 27;30(8):1172–1177. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3269-7

Table 3.

Published Versus Non-Published Medical Education Abstracts Presented at the SGIM National Meeting

Category Published abstracts (n = 64) Non-published abstracts (n = 80) p value
 Quantitative 53 (83 %) 67 (84 %) 0.88
 Population
  UME 17 (27 %) 27 (34 %)
  GME 33 (52 %) 42 (53 %)
  CME 3 (5 %) 4 (5 %)
  Mixed/other 11 (17 %) 7 (9 %)
 Abstract type
  Scientific 42 (66 %) 37 (46 %) 0.02
 Presentation
  Oral 15 (23 %) 6 (8 %) 0.01
MERSQI domain Published abstracts (n = 52)* Non-published abstracts (n = 67) p value
 Study design 1.57 (0.52) 1.40 (0.40) 0.05
 Sampling 1.29 (0.74) 1.16 (0.57) 0.32
 Type of data 2.08 (1.00) 2.03 (1.03) 0.80
 Validity 0.25 (0.59) 0.33 (0.59) 0.47
 Data analysis 2.42 (0.50) 2.14 (0.69) 0.01
 Outcomes 1.94 (0.60) 1.75 (0.59) 0.09
 Total 9.59 (1.84) 8.81 (1.91) 0.03

*The N for calculating MERSQI corresponds to the number of abstracts describing quantitative studies, excluding one study that presented conflicting data.

MERSQI Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument, UME undergraduate medical education, GME graduate medical education, CME continuing medical education