Table 2.
A comparison of conidial morphology of Diplodia spp.
| Species | Group sensu Phillips et al. (2013) | Conidial dimensions (μm) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| D. africana | A | (17–)25.5–33(–34) × (10–)12–14(–15) | Damm et al. (2007a) |
| D. agrifolia | A | (21.5–)27–36.5 × (12–)14.5–18 | Lynch et al. (2013) |
| D. bulgarica | A | (22.5–)24–27(–28) × (14.5–)15.5–18(–18.5) | Phillips et al. (2012) |
| D. corticola | C | (23.5–)26–34.5(–46) × (9–)12–16(–18.5) | Alves et al. (2004) |
| D. cupressi | A | (21.5–)23.5–28.5(–30.5) × (12–)13.5–15(–16) | Alves et al. (2006) |
| D. malorum | A | (24–)26–32(–36) × (12–)13–17.5(–18.5) | Phillips et al. (2012) |
| D. mutila | A | (23.5–)24.5–27(–27.5) × (12.5–)13–14(–14.5) | Montagne (1834) |
| D. neojuniperi | A | (17—)18–21(–22) × (9–)10—11 | Present study |
| D. olivarum | A | (21.5–)22–27.5(–28.5) × (10–)11–13.5(–14.5) | Lazzizera et al. (2008) |
| D. quercivora | C | (22.75–)28.14(–30.41) × (11.32–)13.08(–14.36) | Linaldeddu et al. (2013) |
| D. rosulata | A | (21–)25–32(–36) × (10–)11–17.5(–19.5) | Gure et al. (2005) |
| D. sapinea | B | (25.5–)30.5–52.5(–54) × (10–)12.5–20(–21) | Fuckel (1870) |
| D. seriata | B | (21.5–)22–27(–28) × (11–)11.5–14.5(–15.5) | de Notaris (1845) |
| D. tsugae | A | 36–41 × 18–22 | Phillips et al. (2012) |