Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 8;6:7544. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8544

Table 2. Significant effects from experiment 2 (n=12).

Effect F df P η2
Grasping asynchrony
 Main effect of clip-type 14.69 1,11 0.003 0.572
 Action-type × clip-type × movement-type 6.14 1,11 0.031 0.358
 Site × action-type 7.54 1,11 0.019 0.407
         
Reaction times        
 No significant effect
         
Movement times
 Main effect of clip-type 266.4 1,11 <0.001 0.960
 Action-type × movement-type 1,264 1,11 <0.001 0.991
 Action-type × clip-type × movement-type 62.94 1,11 <0.001 0.851
         
maxH
 Main effect of clip-type 297.9 1,11 <0.001 0.964
 Main effect of movement-type 213.4 1,11 <0.001 0.950
 Action-type × clip-type 13.2 1,11 0.004 0.546
 Clip-type × movement-type 240.9 1,11 <0.001 0.956
 Action-type × clip-type × movement-type 5.6 1,11 0.038 0.336
         
maxAp
 Main effect of clip-type 296.9 1,11 <0.001 0.964
 Main effect of movement-type 269.1 1,11 <0.001 0.960
 Action-type × clip-type 5.6 1,11 0.037 0.338
 Clip-type × movement-type 175.7 1,11 <0.001 0.941
 Clip-type × action-type × movement-type 11.6 1,11 0.006 0.512

ANOVA, analysis of variance; maxAp, maximum grip aperture; maxH, maximum wrist height.

The table reports all significant effects showed by the repeated measures ANOVAs on z-scores of grasping asynchrony, reaction times, movement times and wrist and pre-shaping kinematics (maxH and maxAp), having stimulation site (aIPS/vertex) × action-type (complementary/imitative) × clip-type (correction/no-correction) × movement-type (power/precision grip) as within-subject factors (see Methods section). In bold and italics are the significant interaction between action-type × stimulation site on grasping asynchrony described in the main text.