Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 22;15:86. doi: 10.1186/s12887-015-0404-x

Table 2.

Study description and protocol used

ID Source – Country – Study design Starting year + duration in months Criteria used for assessment of Audiological Risk Healthcare Setting Tests Number of tests (before discharge; after d.; total) Extent of Hearing Loss for screening phase Operator performing the test Testing environmental conditions
1 Bevilacqua M, 2010 [33] – Brasil - Hospital-based series not exactly known, starting from 2004 to 2007 + 36 m JCIH 2007 1 Hospital OAEa 1; 1; 2 40 dB HL; unilateral Audiologist Non-sound-treated room (average noise < 45 dB)
2 Calevo M, 2007 [34] – Italy – multicentric Hospital-based series 2002, February + 35 m JCIH 1994 13 Hospitals Bothb 1; 3; 4 50 dB SPLb,c; unilateral N.R. Sound-proof and faradized room
3 Cebulla M, 2012 [35] – Germany - Hospital-based series 2006, March + 60 m N.R. 1 Well baby nursery - University maternity clinic ABRa 1; 1; 2 35 dB nHLd (aABR); unilateral Trained physician assistants, nurses Quiet room (stage 1); acoustically and electrically shielded room(stage 2)
4 De Capua, 2007 [36] – Italy – Multicentric hospital-based series 1998, April + 100 m JCIH, 2000 3 hospitals Bothe 1; 2; 3 30 dB nHLd; unilateral Technician Silent room
5 Guastini L, 2010 [37] – Italy - Hospital-based series 2006, January + 36 m Ad hoc 1 University Hospital Bothb 1; 3; 4 40 dB HL; unilateral ENT specialists experienced in neonatal screening techniques Sound-proof and faradised room
6 Habib H, 2005 [38] – Saudi Arabia - Hospital-based series 1996, September + 89 m JCIH 1994 1 Hospital OAEa 2; 0; 2 26 dB HL; unilateral Technician N.R.
7 Kennedy C, 2005 [39] - UK - Prospective cohortf 1993, October + 36 m Ad hoc 4 Hospitals Botha 2; 0; 2 40 dB HL; bilateral Trained nurse N.R.
8 Korres S, 2008 [40] – Greece - Hospital-based series N.R. + N.R. N.R. 1 Hospital OAE 3; 1; 4 40 dB HL; unilateral Audiologist Quite room
9 Lin H, 2007 [41] – Taiwan - Retrospective cohort a) 1998, November + 60 m; N.R. 1 Hospital a) OAEa
b) Botha
c) ABRa
a) 2–3; 0; 2–3
b) 2; 0; 2
c) 2; 0; 2
N.R.; unilateral N.R. N.R.
b) 2004, February + 12 m;
c) 2005, March + 14 m
10 Rohlfs AK, 2010 [42] – Germany – multicentric hospital based series 2002 August + 48 m Ad hoc 14 birth clinics and children hospitals Both 2; 1; 3 35 dB (aABR); unilateral Trained nurses and physicians N.R.
11 Tatli MM, 2007 [43] – Turkey - Prospective cohort 2002 + 18 m Ad Hoc 1 University Hospital OAEa 1; 1; 2 N.R.; unilateral N.R. Quite room
12 Tsuchiya H, 2006 [44] – Japan - Prospective cohort 1999, July + 64 m N.R. 1 Hospital ABRa 1; 1; 2 35 dB HL (aABR); unilateral Technician N.R.

aNo differences for neonates with audiological risk were specified

bWith both automatic and diagnostic ABR

cEquivalent to about 40db HL in voice frequency

ddB nHL = Decibel Normal Hearing

eDiagnostic instead of automatic ABR

fData not reported in Kennedy have been gathered from Wessex [45]