Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Youth Adolesc. 2014 Jun 26;44(9):1688–1701. doi: 10.1007/s10964-014-0143-6

Table 3.

Logistic regression results predicting alcohol use behaviors separately for parent knowledge, parent control, parent solicitation, and child disclosure

Parental Knowledge Parental Control
Ever Sip Ever Drink Ever Drunk Ever Sip Ever Drink
Step 1 – All Models
 Pseudo R2 0.07 0.22 0.25 0.07 0.22
 Sex (1=male, 0=female) 0.93
(0.65 – 1.35)		 0.97
(0.47 – 2.01)		 0.75
(0.23 – 2.49)		 0.95
(0.66 – 1.38)		 0.98
(0.47 – 2.02)
 Grade in School 1.42**
(1.14 – 1.79)		 2.90***
(1.66 – 5.06)		 4.82**
(1.50 – 15.47)		 1.43**
(1.14 – 1.80)		 2.89***
(1.66 – 5.05)
 Parental Support 0.85
(0.68 – 1.07)		 0.66
(0.41 – 1.05)		 0.64
(0.29 – 1.42)		 0.87
(0.69 – 1.09)		 0.66
(0.41 – 1.06)
 Negative Interactions 1.63**
(1.20 – 2.22)		 2.48***
(1.56 – 3.95)		 2.60**
(1.34 – 5.04)		 1.62**
(1.19 – 2.21)		 2.46***
(1.55 – 3.92)
 Parent After School Supervision 0.98
(0.91–1.06)		 0.92
(0.80 – 1.07)		 1.10
(0.86 – 1.40)		 0.98
(0.91– 1.06)		 0.93
(0.80– 1.07)
Step 2 – Model 1
 Pseudo R2 0.08 0.26 0.36 0.09 0.25
 Parents’ Reports 0.93
(0.77 – 1.11)		 0.91
(0.66 – 1.25)		 0.64
(0.42 – 1.00)		 0.92
(0.76 – 1.11)		 0.84
(0.61 – 1.17)
 Adolescents’ Reports 0.89
(0.72 – 1.09)		 0.59**
(0.42 – 0.85)		 0.38**
(0.21 – 0.70)		 0.80*
(0.66 – 0.97)		 0.69*
(0.49 – 0.96)
Step 2 – Model 2a
 Pseudo R2 0.08 0.26 0.36 0.09 0.25
 Parents’ Reports 0.82
(0.63 – 1.06)		 0.54**
(0.34 – 0.84)		 0.25***
(0.11 – 0.53)		 0.74*
(0.57 – 0.96)		 0.58*
(0.37 – 0.91)
 Discrepancy Scorea 1.13
(0.92 – 1.39)		 1.69**
(1.18 – 2.40)		 2.63**
(1.44 – 4.82)		 1.25*
(1.03 – 1.52)		 1.46*
(1.05 – 2.04)
Step 2 – Model 2b
 Pseudo R2 0.08 0.26 0.36 0.09 0.25
 Adolescents’ Reports 0.82
(0.63 – 1.06)		 0.54**
(0.34 – 0.84)		 0.25***
(0.11 – 0.53)		 0.74*
(0.57 – 0.96)		 0.58*
(0.37 – 0.91)
 Discrepancy Scorea 0.92
(0.77– 1.12)		 0.91
(0.66 – 1.25)		 0.64
(0.42 – 1.00)		 0.92
(0.76 – 1.12)		 0.84
(0.61 – 1.17)
Step 2 – Model 3
 Pseudo R2 0.08 0.26 0.38 0.09 0.25
 Parents’ Reports 0.92
(0.76 – 1.12)		 0.93
(0.63 – 1.37)		 0.90
(0.40 – 2.06)		 0.92
(0.76 – 1.12)		 0.79
(0.56 – 1.12)
 Adolescents’ Reports 0.89
(0.72 – 1.09)		 0.60**
(0.42 – 0.85)		 0.40**
(0.22 – 0.74)		 0.80*
(0.66 – 0.98)		 0.69* (0.49 – 0.96)
 Parents’ X Adolescents’ Interaction 0.99
(0.83 – 1.20)		 1.03
(0.76 – 1.40)		 1.41
(0.80 – 2.48)		 0.98
(0.78 – 1.25)		 0.84
(0.56 – 1.27)
Step 2 – Model 4b
 Pseudo R2 0.09 0.31 0.38 0.09 0.26
 High Parent – Low Adolescent 0.60
(0.34 – 1.06)		 0.51
(0.22 – 1.19)		 0.10*
(0.01 – 0.84)		 0.77
(0.37 – 1.61)		 1.10
(0.37 – 3.29)
 Low Parent – High Adolescent 0.66
(0.37 – 1.16)		 0.20**
(0.06 – 0.64)		 0.26
(0.05 – 1.36)		 0.49
(0.21 – 1.18)		 0.89
(0.21 – 3.81)
 High Parent – High Adolescent 0.49*
(0.29 – 0.85)		 0.06***
(0.01 – 0.30)		 0.00***
N/Ac 		0.45*
(0.22 – 0.91)		 0.36
(0.11 – 1.11)
Parent Solicitation Child Disclosure
Ever Sip Ever Drink Ever Drunk Ever Sip Ever Drink
Step 1 – All Models
 Pseudo R2 0.07 0.22 0.25 0.07 0.23
 Sex 0.95
(0.66 – 1.38)		 0.97
(0.47 – 2.00)		 0.75
(0.23 – 2.49)		 0.94
(0.65 – 1.36)		 1.01
(0.48 – 2.10)
 Grade in School 1.39**
(1.11 – 1.75)		 2.89***
(1.65 – 5.05)		 4.81**
(1.50 – 15.44)		 1.41**
(1.12 – 1.77)		 3.02***
(1.70 – 5.36)
 Parental Support 0.85
(0.68 – 1.07)		 0.66
(0.41 – 1.05)		 0.64
(0.29 – 1.41)		 0.83
(0.66 – 1.05)		 0.66
(0.41 – 1.07)
 Negative Interactions 1.66**
(1.21 – 2.26)		 2.48***
(1.56 – 3.94)		 2.60**
(1.34 – 5.03)		 1.58**
(1.16 – 2.16)		 2.40***
(1.50 – 3.84)
 Parent After School Supervision 0.98
(0.91– 1.06)		 0.92
(0.80– 1.07)		 1.09
(0.86 – 1.39)		 0.98
(0.91– 1.06)		 0.92
(0.79 – 1.07)
Step 2 – Model 1
 Pseudo R2 0.08 0.23 0.25 0.08 0.25
 Parents’ Reports 1.12
(0.92 – 1.37)		 1.12
(0.76 – 1.65)		 0.91
(0.50 – 1.67)		 0.99
(0.82 – 1.20)		 0.84
(0.58 – 1.21)
 Adolescents’ Reports 1.03
(0.84 – 1.27)		 1.09
(0.71 – 1.66)		 0.85
(0.41 – 1.74)		 0.86
(0.68 – 1.08)		 0.69
(0.46 – 1.03)
Step 2 – Model 2a
 Pseudo R2 0.08 0.23 0.25 0.08 0.25
 Parents’ Reports 1.16
(0.91 – 1.48)		 1.22
(0.74 – 2.00)		 0.77
(0.34 – 1.74)		 0.85
(0.65 – 1.10)		 0.57*
(0.35 – 0.93)
 Discrepancy Scorea 0.97
(0.79 – 1.20)		 0.92
(0.60 – 1.41)		 1.18
(0.58 – 2.43)		 1.17
(0.93 – 1.47)		 1.46
(0.97 – 2.20)
Step 2 – Model 2b
 Pseudo R2 0.08 0.23 0.25 0.08 0.25
 Adolescents’ Reports 1.16
(0.91 – 1.48)		 1.22
(0.74 – 2.00)		 0.77
(0.34 – 1.74)		 0.85
(0.65 – 1.11)		 0.57*
(0.35 – 0.93)
 Discrepancy Score a 1.12
(0.92 – 1.37)		 1.12
(0.76 – 1.65)		 0.91
(0.50 – 1.67)		 0.99
(0.82 – 1.20)		 0.84
(0.58 – 1.21)
Step 2 – Model 3
 Pseudo R2 0.09 0.24 0.25 0.08 0.26
 Parents’ Reports 1.08
(0.88 – 1.32)		 1.01
(0.68 – 1.51)		 0.97
(0.47 – 2.01)		 1.00
(0.82 – 1.22)		 0.74
(0.50 – 1.09)
 Adolescents’ Reports 1.04
(0.85 – 1.29)		 1.11
(0.73 – 1.68)		 0.84
(0.41 – 1.75)		 0.86
(0.68 – 1.09)		 0.64*
(0.42 – 0.98)
 Parents’ X Adolescents’ Interaction 0.80*
(0.66 – 0.98)		 0.72
(0.48 – 1.08)		 1.10
(0.60 – 2.01)		 1.10
(0.90 – 1.33)		 0.79
(0.57 – 1.09)
Step 2 – Model 4b
 Pseudo R2 0.08 0.23 0.26 0.08 0.24
 High Parent – Low Adolescent 0.97
(0.56 – 1.66)		 1.36
(0.52 – 3.57)		 1.37
(0.36 – 5.27)		 0.73
(0.43 – 1.27)		 0.56
(0.21 – 1.50)
 Low Parent – High Adolescent 1.32
(0.77 – 2.27)		 1.45
(0.49 – 4.25)		 0.45
(0.05 – 4.36)		 0.57
(0.31 – 1.03)		 0.52
(0.15 – 1.83)
 High Parent – High Adolescent 1.12
(0.67 – 1.87)		 1.37
(0.47 – 3.95)		 0.58
(0.09 – 3.72)		 0.82
(0.49 – 1.37)		 0.37
(0.12 – 1.10)

Note. Bolded cells depict the pseudo-R2 value for the corresponding model. Supplemental models were run with adolescents’ schools included as a multinomial covariate. Results were nearly identical across outcomes, so the more parsimonious models were retained.

a

Discrepancy Score = Standardized Parent Report – Standardized Adolescent Report

b

Reference = Low Parent – Low Adolescent.

c

Nearly perfect association between membership and outcome; confidence intervals could not be calculated.

*

p <0.05,

**

p < 0.01,

***

p < 0.001