Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 23;6:571. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00571

Table 2.

Leaf macro and micro-nutrient concentration in the seven citrus plant species.

Leaf macronutrient concentration (g 100 g-1 dw)
Plant species N K Ca Mg
Carrizo citrange 3.59 a 1.53 a 1.87 c 0.35 b
Clemenules mandarin 2.69 c 0.56 c 5.99 a 0.56 a
Lane late orange 2.82 c 0.69 c 5.75 a 0.49 a
Verna lemon 1.93 d 1.16 b 3.75 b 0.27 bc
Citrus Macrophylla 3.30 ab 1.42 ab 1.25 c 0.17 c
Sour orange 2.95 bc 1.35 ab 1.37 c 0.30 b
Star ruby grapefruit 2.61 c 0.58 c 5.77 a 0.59 a

ANOVA
∗∗∗ ∗∗∗ ∗∗∗ ∗∗∗

Leaf micronutrient concentration (mg kg-1 dw)
B Fe Cu Mn Zn

Carrizo citrange 96.87 b 237.03 ab 5.59 48.65 a 26.61 b
Clemenules mandarin 206.98 a 75.31 c 2.64 43.86 ab 32.39 ab
Lane late orange 126.91 ab 74.15 c 3.69 40.71 abc 36.78 a
Verna lemon 79.76 b 95.55 bc 4.69 35.85 bc 14.51 c
Citrus Macrophylla 44.97 b 106.22 bc 6.02 29.42 c 15.99 c
Sour orange 76.79 b 345.07 a 6.20 39.60 abc 13.97 c
Star ruby grapefruit 198.71 a 65.83 c 4.11 43.06 ab 31.23 ab

ANOVA
∗∗ ∗∗ ns ∗∗ ∗∗

Inside of each column, means (n = 4) with the same letter are not significantly different from each other (Duncan test p > 0.05). ns indicate non-significant effects; , ∗∗ and ∗∗∗ indicates significant differences at p < 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively.