Table 5.
Sex | Infants | Children | Juveniles | Adolescents | Adults | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAZ | ♂a | −1.31 | −1.57 | −0.92 | −1.58 | −0.25 |
♀b | −1.43 | −1.21 | −1.26 | −0.92 | −0.19 | |
P-Value | NS | NS | NS | <0.01 | NS | |
WHZ/BMIZ | ♂ | −0.04 | −1.42 | −1.88 | −1.81 | −1.54 |
♀c | −0.06 | −1.62 | −1.79 | −1.37 | −1.27 | |
P-value | NS | NS | NS | <0.01 | <0.01 | |
ZUMA | ♂d | – | −2.04 | −2.30 | −2.53 | −2.04 |
♀e | – | −1.46 | −1.86 | −1.31 | −0.91 | |
P-value | 0.03 | 0.02 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
ZTSF | ♂f | – | −0.29 | −1.25 | −0.75 | −0.43 |
♀ | – | −0.59 | −0.95 | −0.87 | −0.83 | |
P-Value | NS | NS | NS | <0.01 |
P-Values shows significant differences between male and females
aMale adults have significantly higher HAZ than all male groups except for Juveniles (F = 22.07, P < 0.01)
bFemale adults have significantly higher HAZ than all other female groups (F = 20.4, P < 0.01)
cJuvenile females have significantly lower BMIZ than adolescent and adult females (F = 5.22, P < 0.01)
dMale adults have significantly higher ZUMA than male adolescents (F = 3.02, P < 0.05)
eFemale adults have significantly higher ZUMA than any other group; Female adolescents have significantly higher ZUMA than female juveniles (F = 19.34, P < 0.01)
fMale children have significantly higher ZTSF than male juveniles; male adults have significantly higher ZTSF than male juveniles (F = 3.99, P < 0.01)