Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 23;9(7):e0003936. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003936

Table 1. Leishmania parasite load levels per skin lesion site and sampling method.

Skin lesion site Sampling method Parasite load
Median IQR Range
Raised border Biopsy ¥ 2.96 × 103 1.59 × 102–1.94 × 104 2.87 × 101–2.88 × 105
Scraping 5.96 × 104 3.14 × 103–1.31 × 105 1.81 × 102–6.84 × 105
Base (inner border)* Biopsy ¥ 3.33 × 104 1.86 × 103–1.32 × 105 7.44 × 101–1.56 × 106
Scraping 7.61 × 104 7.29 × 103–3.90 × 105 2.24 × 102–1.17 × 106
Cytology brush § 1.76 × 105 1.76 × 104–9.67 × 105 1.14 × 103–4.12 × 106
Center* Biopsy ¥ 2.11 × 104 2.14 × 103–1.19 × 105 2.53 × 101–2.29 × 106
Scraping 1.11 × 105 1.50 × 104–3.78 × 105 1.72 × 102–2.92 × 106
Cytology brush § 1.61 × 105 2.69 × 104–1.04 × 106 1.07 × 103–5.72 × 106

Note. IQR, interquartile range (25th percentile–75th percentile).

Data shown are the quantified paired parasite load results (8 specimens per lesion) corresponding to 28 patients.

Number of parasites per μg of tissue DNA.

P<0.0001, for the comparison of parasite loads between biopsy and scraping specimens (Wilcoxon signed rank test).

*P<0.0001, for the comparison of parasite loads among biopsy, scraping, and cytology brush specimens (Friedman test with Dunn’s post hoc test).

¥ P<0.0001, for the comparison of parasite loads among biopsy specimens of the ulcer border, base, and center (Friedman test with Dunn’s post hoc test).

P = 0.0002, for the comparison of parasite loads among scraping specimens of the ulcer border, base, and center (Friedman test with Dunn’s post hoc test).

§ P = 0.07, for the comparison of parasite loads between cytology brush specimens of the ulcer base and center (Wilcoxon signed rank test).