Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 1;58(4):237–244. doi: 10.1503/cjs.001515

Table 2.

Univariate analysis according to clinicopathological factors in advanced rectal cancer patients.

Factor No. of patients Median OS, mo p value Median DFS, mo p value
Sex 0.22 0.08
 Male 111 46.7 20.3
 Female 69 40.2 20.2
Age, yr 0.60 0.35
 < 65 117 43.0 17.8
 ≥ 65 63 57.9 29.6
Distance from anal verge, cm 0.98 0.98
 < 7 111 44.7 21.9
 ≥ 7 69 42.2 19.5
Pathological type 0.042 0.024
 Canalicular adenoma 157 45.5 23.2
 Mucinous adenoma 23 34.5 16.4
Differentiation 0.007 0.022
 Well 28 67.5 11.2
 Moderate 138 46.7 23.2
 Poor 14 33.4 17.7
LNs examined 0.001 < 0.001
 < 12 83 39.4 15.8
 ≥12 97 59.1 32.2
LNR 0.004 0.002
 0 51 64.2 32.9
 ≤ 0.19 15 59.1 30.4
 > 0.19 114 37.6 17.8
pN stage < 0.001 < 0.001
 N0 46 68.5 35.4
 N1a 10 52.9 15.8
 N1b 36 59.1 16.4
 N1c 12 26.7 12.7
 N2a 35 46.7 34.0
 N2b 41 27.2 20.2
TNM stage < 0.001 0.001
 II 46 68.5 35.4
 IIIA 6 75.7 24.7
 IIIB 66 45.6 17.7
 IIIC 62 29.7 15.8
Postoperative chemotherapy 0.48 0.22
 Yes 168 45.2 20.2
 No 12 19.7
Postoperative radiotherapy < 0.001 < 0.001
 Yes 101 59.6 34.0
 No 79 37.6 15.1

DFS = disease-free survival; LNs = lymph nodes; LNR = lymph node ratio; OS = overall survival; pN = metastasis classification of lymph nodes; TNM = tumour-node-metastasis.