Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 20;45(8):2311–2322. doi: 10.1007/s10803-015-2393-x

Table 1.

Scoring of example scenario from the ‘Social Expectations’ task

Description of criteria
Person-based rationales
A response that either referred to the characters’ needs, and/or conveyed a sense of self-sacrifice on the participants’ part in order to meet the characters’ needs
Rule-based rationales
A response that made explicit reference to a social rule guiding an expectation to help, or implied a social rule by simply referring to the facts of the scenario
Example responses:
Clear - cut ending: “She is elderly and walking with a stick”
Person-based rationale examples
e.g. “I would feel sorry for her and it would be difficult for her to stand in a crowded waiting room”
e.g. “She needs it more than I do”
Rule-based rationale examples
e.g. “You should always offer your seat to women, elderly and the disabled”
e.g. “She is walking with a stick”
Ambiguous ending: “She is a young adult and is carrying a large parcel”
Person-based rationale examples
e.g. “She must be feeling very tired”
e.g. “I think she needs it more than I do because she is carrying a large parcel”
Rule-based rationale examples
e.g. “To be polite”
e.g. “It is common courtesy to offer your seat”