Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 21;86(4):444–450. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2015.1005907

Table 3.

Influence of component alignment on the preoperative-postoperative difference in patellar kinematics estimated with generalized linear models

ML-shift a
Epicondylar distance a
Parameter Estimate b (95% CI) p-value Estimate b (95% CI) p-value
Flexion
 30° 1.3 (–0.2 to 2.9) 0.1 4.1 (0.4 to 7.9) 0.02
 45° 1.1 (0.0 to 2.4) 0.1 4.3 (0.9 to 7.7) 0.01
 60° 1.0 (0.3 to 1.8) < 0.01 2.4 (0.4 to 4.5) 0.01
 75° 0.5 (0.0 to 1.1) 0.1 2.5 (0.8 to 4.3) < 0.01
 90° reference reference
Flexion, FC (per 1°) 0.5 (0.0 to 1.1) 0.04 0.6 (0.0 to 1.2) 0.03
Flexion, FC
Flexion a
 30° –0.1 (–0.5 to 0.2) 0.5 –0.5 (-1.0 to 0.0) 0.1
 45° –0.1 (–0.4 to 0.2) 0.4 –0.3 (-0.9 to 0.1) 0.1
 60° –0.1 (–0.3 to 0.0) 0.2 –0.2 (-0.5 to 0.0) 0.1
 75° 0.0 (–0.3 to 0.2) 0.9 0.0 (-0.2 to 0.1) 0.6
 90° reference reference
Posterior slope, TC (per 1°) 0.4 (–0.2 to 1.1) 0.2 0.9 (0.3 to 1.4) < 0.01
Posterior slope, TC
Flexion a not included
 30° –0.5 (–1.1 to 0.0) 0.1
 45° –0.5 (–1.1 to 0.0) 0.1
 60° –0.2 (–0.5 to 0.1) 0.2
 75° –0.3 (–0.6 to 0.0) 0.04
 90° reference
Rotation FC (per 1°) –0.1 (–0.3 to 0.0) 0.2 0.0 (-0.1 to 0.1) 1.0
a

Difference in preoperative and postoperative values.

b

The estimate of each parameter gives the change in ML-shift or epicondylar distance either per one unit change in the parameter or in relation to the reference category. For example, by changing flexion from 90° to 60°, the difference (pre-post) in the ML-shift will increase by 1.0 mm and decrease by –0.1 times the flexion of the femoral component.

FC: femoral component

TC: tibial component