Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Exp Brain Res. 2015 May 15;233(8):2301–2310. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4299-4

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Relationship between magnitude of adaptation (abscissa) and after-effect (ordinate) during reaching (squares) and walking (circles) adaptation. Error bars are ±SEM. *Significant post hoc differences in MPost between PD − FOG and PD + FOG (p = 0.009). In addition, MPost was significantly different across tasks (reaching > walking; F36,1 = 54.314, p < 0.001)