Table 3.
Marker | Score | Conventional method of scoring | Digital method of scoring | Correlation | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Available values | Max | Min | Median | Available values | Max | Min | Median | Spearman’s co-efficient | ||
Ki67 | Maximum of the 3 cores | 258 | 95 | 0 | 10 | 175 | 97 | 0 | 7 | n = 174a |
0.90 (0.86−0.92) | ||||||||||
p < 0.001 | ||||||||||
Average of the 3 cores | 258 | 90 | 0 | 7.7 | 175 | 85.33 | 0 | 4.5 | n = 174a | |
0.91 (0.88−0.93) | ||||||||||
p < 0.001 | ||||||||||
MCM2 | Maximum of the 3 cores | 260 | 100 | 0 | 30 | 167 | 100 | 0 | 37 | n = 167a |
0.92 (0.90−0.94) | ||||||||||
p < 0.001 | ||||||||||
Average of the 3 cores | 260 | 100 | 0 | 24 | 167 | 98.5 | 0 | 27 | n = 167a | |
0.94 (0.91−0.95) | ||||||||||
p < 0.001 | ||||||||||
Geminin | Maximum of the 3 cores | 258 | 40 | 0 | 5 | 270 | 62 | 0 | 2 | n = 257 |
0.88 (0.85−0.91) | ||||||||||
p < 0.001 | ||||||||||
Average of the 3 cores | 258 | 28.3 | 0 | 3 | 270 | 37 | 0 | 2 | n = 257 | |
0.90 (0.87−0.92) | ||||||||||
p < 0.001 |
aThe number of cores available for digital scoring was not the same as the number available for scoring conventionally. Hence, only those scored by both techniques were compared with each other