Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 25;15:25. doi: 10.1186/s12880-015-0067-y

Table 1.

Layer-specific left ventrcular strain measurements at rest using CAG as reference for CAD

Strain values (%) Differences endo-epic. strain
Study Indication CAG CAD+ CAD- p-value CAD+ CAD- p-value AUC for CAD+, TLS/GCS (%)
Sarvari [23] Suspected NSTE-ACS n = 77 CAD+ n = 49 TLS: −14.0 ± 3.3 −19.2 ± 2.2 <0.001 Δ2.4 ± 3.6 Δ5.3 ± 2.1 <0.001 Endocardial: 0.91/0.85
CAD- n = 28 GCS: −19.3 ± 4.0 - 24.3 ± 3.4 <0.001 Δ2.4 ± 3.7 Δ10.4 ± 3.0 <0.001 Mid-myocardial: 0.91/0.87
GLS: −15.3 ± 2.2 −19.2 ± 2.2 <0.001 Δ2.4 ± 3.8 Δ5.3 ± 2.1 <0.001 Epicardial: 0.79/0.68

Strain values and differences between andocardial and epicardial strain are presented as mean ± SD

NSTE-ACS Non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome, CAG Coronary angiography, CAD+ Coronary artery disease, defined as coronary artery stenosis ≥ 50 %, TLS Territorial longitudinal strain, GCS Global circumferential strain, endo endocardial, epic epicardial, AUC Area under the curve for ROC analysis of prediction of CAD being present or not